Mary Elizabeth Lease and William Jennings Bryan were passionate speakers around the United States severe recession of the 1890s.
They both spoke passionately on behalf of farmers and the less powerful.
Among other speeches' similarities we can name:
- Taking a Stand for Farmers’ Rights
- Standing up against government's corruption at the time, and against the misuse of the public treasury.
- Their passionate speeches were populists and used to highlight the Income Inequality.
What is the real meaning of this questions
Answer: The Senate.
Explanation: To balance the role of the House in breaking presidential ties, the Twelfth Amendment requires the Senate to handle that Job for tied vice-presidential contests. The Senate must choose between the two top electoral vote recipients, with at least two-thirds of the Senate's members voting.
You didn't attach the map you were shown, but I can tell you what that map would look like.
Israel had gained control of several sections of territory which they had not previously controlled. In the south, Israel now held control of the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula (which had been held by Egypt). Along the Jordan River, Israel now controlled the region known as the West Bank (which was a region where Palestinians lived). In the north Israel had taken the Golan Heights away from the control of Syria.
In negotiations after the war, there were thoughts of returning land for peace, but that really only has happened in the case of Israel's relationship with Egypt. (Israel and Egypt signed a lasting peace agreement in 1979.)
Answer:
Practically the entirety of the cases that the Supreme Court hears are cases that are on allure. The Supreme Court has unique purview over a not many cases, however these are very uncommon. This implies that the Supreme Court is quite often hearing situations where just matters of law are at issue (instead of issues of certainty). The Supreme Court is essentially, in those cases, attempting to choose if the law (regardless of whether rule law or the Constitution) has been effectively applied.
Explanation:
Cases heard by the Supreme Court for the most part include significant and troublesome issues of law. Cases that are not significant, or where the law is self evident, don't make it as far as possible up the stepping stool to the Supreme Court.
Thus, the cases the Court hears are those that include significant and troublesome inquiries of law. It hears those cases either after they have come up through the government court framework or after they have been chosen by the high court of a state.
