Answer:
Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT).
Explanation:
As the exercise details, the DOT was a creation of the Department of Labor which meant to use it as a vehicle for helping the new public employment system link the demand for skills and the supply of skills in the U.S workforce. It helped define many different types of work. It's still available nowadays, even though it was developed from 1938 until the late 1990s.
I believe the answer is: <span>Midwest
For those who involved in politics, it is a well-known fact that 3 Midwest Regions are considered as 'the big three Democratic Stronghold', which almost always guarantee a favorable result for them.
The states that included in these strongholds are California, New York, and Illinois.</span>
Answer:
<em>anyways the answer is B </em>
Explanation: <em>people only borrow money when it's important, the only thing important there is B, i also did the test and got it right and the bank wouldn't give someone money to go in a fancy restaurant or to hide their mattresses or to buy books and music.</em>
Uh he went to the village and discovered he had a mother and a aunt
Explanation:
Nepal moved from unitary system with a three-level federal system of government. As federalism accelerates, the national health system can also speed up its own decentralization process, reduce disparities in access, and improve health outcomes. The turn towards federalism creates several potential opportunities for the national healthcare system. This is because decision making has been devolved to the federal, provincial and local governments, and so they can make decisions that are more representative of their localised health needs. The major challenge during the transition phase is to ensure that there are uninterrupted supplies of medical commodities and services. This requires scaling up the ability of local bodies to manage drug procurement and general logistics and adequate human resource in local healthcare centres. This article documents the efforts made so far in context of health sector federalization and synthesizes the progress and challenges to date and potential ways forward. This paper is written at a time while it is critical to review the federalism initiatives and develop way forward. As Nepal progress towards the federalized health system, we propose that the challenges inherent with the transition are critically analysed and mitigated while unfolding the potential of federal health system.
Keywords: Challenges and Opportunities, Decentralization, Federalism, Health Reform, Health Sector, Nepal
Background
With the promulgation of its constitution in 2015, Nepal replaced a unitary government with a federal system of government.1 This process has made Nepal a federal democratic republic governed with three levels of government: a federal level, seven provinces and 753 local government.2 It also led to local elections in late 2017 for the first time in two decades, a landmark achievement signalling that federalism is being implemented.2 With the ongoing restructuring of the health system delivery, this article aims to synthesize the progress and challenges to date and potential ways forward based on the perspective of the federal government. The progress of federalization in Nepal is also considered in light of the experiences of other countries that have implemented federalism, and these remarks may be pertinent to progressively guide the management of the health sector federalization.
Current Situation in Nepal
During the last few decades, Nepal Government has made significant progress towards reducing maternal, under-five and infant mortality rates. During the same period, Nepal was able to halt and reverse the trends of tuberculosis
