In positive punishment contingent removal of an aversive stimulus reduces the likelihood that the response will occur again in the future.
In negative punishment the contingent presentation of a stimulus reduces the likelihood the response will occur again in the future.
<h3>What do positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement have in common with each other?</h3>
- Punishment can be used in a positive or bad way, much like reinforcement.
- Any reinforcer, whether positive or negative, makes a behavioral response more likely.
- Positive or negative punishments both reduce the chance of a behavioral response.
<h3>What is reinforcement and its types?</h3>
- Everything that strengthens or improves a behavior qualifies as reinforcement.
- For instance, in a classroom context, forms of reinforcement may include praise, allowing pupils skip over unneeded assignments, or offering out small rewards like candy, extra downtime, or enjoyable hobbies.
<h3>What is positive and negative reinforcement and punishment?</h3>
- By including something desired, positive reinforcement improves the intended behavior (good).
- Aversive reinforcement reduces the goal behavior in positive punishment (bad).
- By removing an unpleasant stimulus, negative reinforcement makes the intended behavior more frequent.
Learn more about positive and negative reinforcement here:
brainly.com/question/2994390
#SPJ4
The answer would be : The power to Impeach
The power to impeach refer to the power of civilian to charge against the holder of public office for any type of misconduct such as fraud, corruption, etc.
I don't know who De Vaca is but by context clues I would infer that he realized that Native Americans where not the savages they where thought to be.
Answer:civil rights act of 1964
Explanation:
Answer:
b. the unlawful taking of or exercise of control over the personal property of another person.
Explanation:
Conversion is a legal term that describes a situation in which an individual, wrongfully or in an unlawful manner, takes possession of a property that does not belong to him or her.
In other words, it is an unauthorized possession of property, without the consent of the rightful owner.
Hence, in this case, the right answer to the definition of Conversion is the unlawful taking of or exercise of control over the personal property of another person.