Answer:
B. $300,000
Explanation:
Macaw Corporation increased its E & P last year for the entire amount of the deferred gain on the installment sale. Since one-half of the $800,000 gain is included in taxable income in the current year, taxable income should be reduced by this amount to determine current E & P. Therefore, Macaw Corporation’s current year E & P is $600,000 ($1 million taxable income – $400,000 of installment sale gain). Because one-half of the current E & P is allocated to Tracy’s distribution, she has a $300,000 dividend
Given:
D = 40 pcs /hour
T = 36/60 = 0.60 hours
X = 0.20
C = 10
Find the value of N.
N = DT (1 + X) / C
N = [40/hr * 0.60 hr (1 + 0.20)] / 10
N = [24 (1.20)] / 10
N = 28.8 / 10
N = 2.88 or 3
3 containers should be used to support the operation.
Unsolicited email that plagues employees at all levels and clogs email systems is also known as spam. Spam emails are typically flooding everyone within the organization, with the same message and is usually something one would not choose to receive. The majority of spam emails that are sent out are commercial advertising which takes time away from receiving other necessary emails.
C = 50 + 0.8Y is the consumption function that is consistent with the provided data. The MPC is determined by subtracting the change in consumption from the change in disposable income, which equals 160/200, or 0.8.
Marginal propensity calculation.
$200 billion less $0 billion equals $200 billion in changes to disposable income.
Consumption change equals $210 minus $50, or $160 billion.
MPC = Change in Consumption/Change in Disposable Income, which equals $160 billion/$200 billion and is equal to 0.8.
There is a 0.8 marginal tendency to consume.
Step 2
This is how consumption function is defined.
C = a + bY
Where,
a = Consumption at zero income level
b = MPC
In given case,
$50 billion would be consumed at a level of income zero.
MPC is 0.8
So,
C = 50 + 0.8Y is the consumption function that matches the provided data.
To learn more about consumption function
brainly.com/question/14975005
#SPJ4
Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.
Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.
Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.
