Answer:
Make since the relevant cost to make it is $59.05
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what Epsilon should choose to:
Relevant costs to make = 8.20 + 24.20 + [41*(100%-35%)]
Relevant costs to make = 8.20 + 24.20 + (41*65%)
Relevant costs to make = 8.20 + 24.20 + 26.65
Relevant costs to make =$59.05
Therefore Epsilon should choose to: MAKE SINCE THE RELEVANT COST TO MAKE IT IS $59.05
Answer: The answer is No, because the MB > MC
Explanation:
They are not cleaning up enough because the MB>MC. Therefore, all other options which cut across - Yes, because the MC > MB,
No, because the MB > MC,
Yes, because the MB > MC and
No, because the MC > MB are wrong.
This is true. :)
Hope this helps.
*ps, I take business, just pm me. :)*
Answer:
Operating profit using absorption costing will be higher by $3,600 than operating income if using variable costing.
Explanation:
<em>The difference between profit under variable costing and under absorption costing is simply the value of the change in inventory.
</em>
<em>Usually, a decrease in inventory would cause profit under absorption costing to be lower . This is so because cost of goods sold would become higher leading to a lower profit
. And vice versa</em>
<em>Difference in profit = POAR × change inventory
</em>
Predetermined Overhead absorption rate(POAR)
= Estimated overhead/ estimated production unit
= $24,000/2,000 units = $12 per unit
Change in inventory = 1500 - 1200= 300 units
Difference in profit = 300 × $12 per unit = $3,600
Operating profit using absorption costing will be higher by $3,600 than operating income if using variable costing.
Answer:
The correct answer is budget slack.
Explanation:
Budget slack occurs in a company when one or more people with budgetary responsibility create a budget that overestimates expenses and / or underestimates projected income or income.
Intentional budget slack can occur because a manager feels under the weapon to "make their numbers", often in response to previous quarters where revenues fell below projections and, more importantly, did not meet expectations of the owners or shareholders.
