Answer:
Minimize harm because the protester might be affected by the interview.
Seek truth because the protester made a statement about a major issue.
Explanation:
The SPJ Code of Ethics is a guide that encourages journalists to take responsibility for the information they provide. It is not a strict set of rules, but it's important either way because some basic principles need to be followed in sensitive cases, such as this one.
As the protester is a minor, she needs to be protected. That's why the harm should be minimized as much as it's possible. But, at the same time, there is a possibility that the mother is not telling the truth. It is understandable that she may not want her daughter to be exposed, but the truth matters. If the protester is aware of the fact her face may be on television and wants to be heard, it should be alright to air the interview. After all, she spoke about an important issue. That's why the reporter should seek the truth and then try making the right decision.
Thus, the correct options are the last two.
Answer: This is all a matter of habit. A habit is something you have created that needs to be stopped. Sometimes you have to know what caused the habit. If you do not know what caused the habit, then that could be the reason why it is still happening.
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe the correct answer is "woke"
