Answer:
Rodney should win the case because he showed up to do the work but Yolanda failed to perform her part of the contract (provide the paint).
The legal term used to describe Rodney's offer of performance is tender or attempted performance. In this case, Rodney (the promisor) went to Yolanda's house and offered to perform his painting services. Yolanda (the promisee) did not perform her part of the contract by not providing the paint, so the promisor was unable to perform. Since Rodney's non-performance was directly caused by Yolanda's non-performance, he is not liable for anything since Yolanda lost her rights because she breached the contract first.
Answer:
Explanation:
Akbar definitely has standing as he is affected by the tax law. State laws are challengeable in federal courts if they affect interstate trade. There is a federal interest here as the state laws affect the interstate trade of ice cream.
However the reason the federal courts would NOT review this case is because the case is moot since the law was repealed.
The answer is C).
Answer:
act of 2019
Explanation:
This bill establishes certain rules that apply in a civil action by the Senate, House of Representatives, or a congressional committee or subcommittee against an individual who receives, but fails to comply with, a congressional subpoena.
Additionally, the bill establishes requirements for the recipient of a subpoena from a congressional committee or subcommittee.
Answer:
trust
Explanation:
if you want to gain power, youre going to need to gain trust from others. further more, when you have enough people that trust you, you gain more popularity.
Answer: limited government and federalism
