Basically win the fight but hold back until the money from the bet was at his highest stake.
Answer: D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
Explanation:
The options include:
Removing the quotation by Redouan Bshary because his conclusions are at odds with Gallup's
B. Changing the thesis statement to argue that the study was faulty because it did not follow Gallup's methodology
C. Incorporating Gallup's response into the first paragraph after describing his original study on Chimpanzees
D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it
E. Expanding on the description of the cleaner wrasse's penchant for eating parasites off other fish.
The change that the writer will need to make in order for this new information to work in the context of the overall argument the writer is making is to update the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
When this is done, it should be reliable to the readers which can be done by supporting the statement with facts.
Both were areas taken over by a foreign power and will be returned to their previous state is the statement which best describes relationship between Belgium and Alsace-Lorraine in the text.
Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
Alsace-Lorraine was taken over by Germany from France in the Franco-Prussian war in 1871. Belgium was invaded by Germany during world War 1. At the End of the World War 1, The Treaty of Versailles was formed to declare the defeat of Germany in World War 1.
As per the Treaty, Germany returned the Alsace –Lorraine Territory back to France and they had to surrender small amount of German Territory to Belgium after the World War 1. Thus they lost control of both the states and many territories.
<u />
The one with the propositional phrase is c. under bridges
