Answer:
During the Vietnam war, congress gave LBJ the unprecedented power of sending troops without declaring war. This allowed him to send US troops to Vietnam to support the war effort without getting completely involved in an all-out war. After the war, Congress realized it should limit the president's power and they signed the war powers act that restricted the president's power to send troops to foreign countries. If the results of the war were different (if we had succeeded instead of failed) Congress may not have been so strict about signing the war powers act.
Hope this helps!! :))
a. ONE major difference between Potter's and Holt's historical interpretations of the Civil War is that David M. Potter described the Civil War as an inevitable event given the institutionalized sectionalism between the North and the South. On the other hand, Michael F. Holt held that the Civil War was an anomaly in American compromise-reaching political tradition.
b. ONE specific historical event or development during 1786-1861 that could support Potter's interpretation is the breakdown of the two-party system. This development pitted far-right democratic republicanism, which promoted white supremacy, whereas center-right republicanism accepted black equality.
Another historical development to support Potter's interpretation is that the South welcomed the Jim Crow laws and sanctioned the separation principle. On the other hand, the North sought to overturn the law and practice of separatism.
c) According to Holt, the Civil War is ONE specific historical event that proved that America broke with its tradition of compromise. During the Great Compromise of 1787, healthy rivalry ensued between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Thus, David M. Potter held that the ingrained divisions between the North and the South caused the Civil War, while Michael F. Holt held that the breakdown of the two-party system occasioned the Civil War.
Learn more about the different historical interpretations of the Civil War here: brainly.com/question/11705791
Some struggles that the people may have had were things such as lack of food, lack of clothing, and lack of sleep.
Civilian supplies were taken by the military, so were the clothing, and the civilians could not sleep due to the fact that people were shooting right outside their homes.
