Answer/Explanation:
Some several reasons or factors led to the sour relationship between the colonists and Britain. However, the most prominent of them all was the imposition of arbitrary taxes on the colonies. After the French and Indian War, Britain sought ways to raise revenue to offset its war debts, so it decided to impose different taxes on the colonies. These taxes include the Stamp duty tax, the Tea tax, etc. The colonist objected to these arbitrary taxes on the ground that they had little or no representation in the parliament and were not supposed to be compelled to pay such taxes, but Britain insisted on the taxes. Also, Britain became more autocratic over the colonies. It passed and enforced arbitrary and selfish policies that were not favorable to the colonies. These events, amongst others, incited the colonies to start seeking independence from Britain. The last straw that broke the camels back was the action of Britain during the Boston Tea Party protest by the colonies. All these contributed to tearing apart the relationship between the colonists and Britain.
Most of Frida Kahlo’s works
depict her struggle as a woman. Majority of her artworks shows her rebellion
against what was the norm in the society during her time. She paints pictures
that show her liberal ways. For example, she painted a picture of her extra
marital affairs.
I would say the benefits would be for example the right to vote in elections, the right to avail themselves of economic opportunities, the right to a higher education and the right to travel freely around the US and the right to form communities of similar ethnic and historical background such as the Latinamericans in the San Fernando Valley.,
The answer is the Bering Strait land bridge.
<span> “</span>And thereupon the said lords spiritual
and temporal and commons . . . do . . . declare that the pretended power of
suspending of laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent
of parliament is illegal.
That levying money for
or to the use of the crown . . . without grant of parliament for longer time or
in other manner than the same is or shall be granted is illegal.
That it is the right of
the subjects to petition the king and all commitments and protections for such
petitioning are illegal.
That the raising or
keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace unless it be with
consent of parliament is against law. . . .
That election of
members of parliament ought to be free. . . .”