Answer:
DR Work in Progress Account $39,650
DR Factory Overhead Account $18,440
CR Wages Payable $58,090
(To record factory Labor Costs)
Workings
Work in Progress
Standard policy is to send the direct cost of Labor to the Work in Progress Account.
The Total direct cost of labor are all of the above except the Indirect cost.
= 3,460 + 2,870 + 5,260 + 5,950 + 3,630 + 2,380 + 16,120
= $39,650
Answer: Yes contract has been formed.
Explanation: According to the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (UETA), electronic transactions are just as binding as transactions made on hardcopy documents. Moreover signatures made electronically reinforces the validity of these elctronic documents.
In the scenario the actual signature was signed on a hard copy by the seller, but it was then faxed back to the listing agent. This faxed copy, showing the faxed signature, is an electronic document that confirms the existence of the contract in accordance with the UETA. This faxed signature is as enforceable as an ink signature.
Answer:
$5
Explanation:
The computation of Alice's consumer surplus is shown below:
Consumer surplus = Willing to spend - Market price after considering the discount
where
Willing to spend = $30
Market price equals to
= Purchase a pair of jeans - coupon rate
= $35 - $10
= $25
So, the consumer surplus is equal to
= $30 - $25
= $5
Answer and Explanation:
Data provided
Depreciation = $185 million
The Journal entry is shown below:-
Depreciation expense $185 million
To Accumulated depreciation $185 million
(Being depreciation expenses is recorded)
Here we debited depreciation expense as expenses are increasing whereas we credited the accumulated depreciation as the assets decreasing.
Answer:
c. No; the facts of this situation do not provide reasonable grounds for a stop and search. Any attempt to do so by store security could result in a claim of false imprisonment.
Explanation:
According to the situation described in the question above, store security has no right to stop and search for Jeff. Therefore, the letter c is the most correct answer to this question.
Jeff's actions in the store do not provide sufficient reasons for there to be any kind of stop and research, as the facts in the situation do not provide enough information about an illegal act, so if store security forces a situation there could be legal damage to the store .
Therefore, it is essential that stores adopt a theft prevention strategy, with an effective security system and a team prepared to carry out correct approaches.
