1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serhud [2]
1 year ago
14

sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. he endorses the products and deposits his compe

nsation for the endorsements for several years. at age 19, he decides he wants to void the agreement to take a better endorsement deal. he claims he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17. can he get out of the contract?
Business
1 answer:
Degger [83]1 year ago
8 0

A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority.  After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.

  • Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
  • Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
  • Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
  • Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
  • Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.

Learn more about minority popularity here:

brainly.com/question/14457086

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Depreciation by Three Methods; Partial Years
Daniel [21]

Answer:

a. Straight-line method.  

Year         Depreciation expense ($)

  1                           10,530

  2                          14,040

  3                          14,040

  4                            3,510

b. Units-of-production method.  

Year           Depreciation expense ($)

 1                               7,800

 2                             14,950

 3                             12,350

 4                              7,020

c. Double-declining balance method

Year   Depreciation expense ($)

  1                              21,735

 2                              14,490

 3                               4,830

 4                               1,065

Explanation:

(a) the straight-line method

Note: See part a of the attached excel file for the depreciation schedule for Straight-line method.

In the attached excel file, the depreciation rate used for the Straight-line method is calculated as follows:

Straight line depreciation rate = 1 / Estimated useful life = 1 / 3 = 0.3333, or 33.33%

(b) units-of-output method

Note: See part b of the attached excel file for the depreciation schedule for units-of-production method.

(c) the double-declining-balance method.

Note: See part c of the attached excel file for the depreciation schedule for double-declining-balance method.

In the attached excel file, the depreciation rate used for the Double- declining-balance method is calculated as follows:

Double-declining depreciation rate = Straight line depreciation rate * 2 = (1/3) * 2 = 0.666667, or 66.6667%

Note:

Under this double-declining-balance method, the depreciation expenses for Year 4 is calculated by deducting the residual value of $1,350 from the Year 4 Beginning depreciable amount (i.e. $2,415 - $1,350 = $1,065). The residual value of $1,350 therefore represents the book value at the end of Year 4.

Download xlsx
6 0
2 years ago
The inflation rate is decreasing and unemployment is rising. The economy is likely in
dsp73
Contraction . Hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the best reason for why someone would want to
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Leasing a house is the other name for renting a house which is preferably far more better for a person or a family who is planning to live there for a short period of time. A lessor is a person who gives his property on rent to the lessee.  It is a way through which the person taking the house on rent is relieved from incurring cost on the repairs if required as the responsibility solely belongs to the owner of the house that is the lessor. People prefering leasing over buying a property is always ready to bear the increase in the costs of rent which is far more lesser than spending money or saving money for the down payment for buying a house. Moreover the person leasing the house only gets the ownership of the house under a contractual basis where they dont have the right to sell the property taken on lease.

8 0
3 years ago
Kirby just inherited $250,000. He would like to hire a financial advisor to provide financial advice and to manage the inheritan
Blababa [14]

Answer:

The answer is A.

Explanation:

According to the details given in the question on the two financial advisor's approach, the first advisor does not request a payment but a commission on the funds purchased with the inheritance money. The second advisor does request payment for the job and also a share on the assets managed with the inheritance money.

If Kirby wants to minimize the upfront expenses which can be described as the sum that is paid before a service or a job is done, then the first advisor is the better option. So the answer is A.

I hope this answer helps.

5 0
3 years ago
A woman walks into a store and steals $100 she comes back and buys $70 worth of goods with the $100, the owner gives her$30 in c
deff fn [24]
The answer is $100.

Amount she steals= $100
Amount she bought goods= $70
Amount the owner returns as change = $30
Amount owner loses=?

Amount she steals +amount of goods - amount she gives to owner + amount owner returns as change = $100 + $70 - $100 + $30 = $200 - $100 = $100
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select the correct statement about HR responsibilities of supervisors.A. Supervisors do not interview job candidates.B. In large
    14·1 answer
  • The following additional details are provided for the​ year: Direct materials placed in production $ 81 comma 500 Direct labor i
    8·1 answer
  • Cost Leadership Strategy is one strategy to gain a competitive advantage.
    7·1 answer
  • All countries have what type of economy
    12·1 answer
  • Guillermo's Oil and Lube Company is a service company that offers oil changes and lubrication for automobiles and light trucks.
    6·1 answer
  • g Hondae Inc. purchased equipment on January 1, 2018, at a cost of $320,000. The company estimated a $8,000 salvage value and th
    7·1 answer
  • Profit Suppose that the daily profit (in dollars) from the production and sale of x units of a product is given byP180xx21000200
    14·1 answer
  • Suppose you started a new job recently. While you were completing your employee information forms online, you noticed that you m
    14·1 answer
  • The quantity supplied for sugar has decreased due to a change in price. How would this change in quantity supplied be represente
    6·1 answer
  • The Consumer Products Division of Goich Corporation had average operating assets of $800,000 and net operating income of $81,300
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!