Identify the fragment?

Explain how the writer uses reporting verbs and language to

nataly862011 [7]

Answer:

The writer uses the reporting verb "snarled" to suggest that the merchant is unfriendly and rude. They also use the verb "muttered" which suggests that the merchant is angry and impatient. The writer uses the reporting verb "remarked" to suggest that the grandmother is pleased with the situation. They also use the verb "sang" to suggest that the grandmother is happy and carefree.

Explanation:

The writer uses the reporting verb "snarled" to suggest that the merchant is unfriendly and rude. This verb choices shows that the merchant is not a pleasant person to interact with. They also use the verb "muttered" which suggests that the merchant is angry and impatient. This verb choice reinforces the idea that the merchant is not a nice person, as they are both angry and impatient. The writer uses the reporting verb "remarked" to suggest that the grandmother is pleased with the situation. This verb choice shows that the grandmother is happy with how things are going. They also use the verb "sang" to suggest that the grandmother is happy and carefree. This verb choice reinforces the idea that the grandmother is a happy and content person.

4 0

2 years ago

What does the text suggest about the values of the animals on Animal Farm in the beginning? Select two options. The animals valu

katrin [286]

First, <em>the animals value freedom.</em>They are not free, they respond to the requirements of human beings and all the decisions in the farm are not for them to make, they do not have a saying at anything connected to them.

Second, <em>The animals value a profit.</em>Whatever they do, they do it for the benefit of humans , not for themselves .They deserve to get some profit from what they do or from what thet are to the farm.They see how human beings take advantage of them and they get nothing in return.They value profit.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Fill in the missing prepositions

Ganezh [65]

Answer:

with

to

at

for

to

from

of

of for

of

than

on

at

like

to

of

in

of

in

with

for

to

of

for

at

on

of

to

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Read this claim from paragraph 3:

Julli [10]

Answer:

Option A

Explanation:

The statement here is a plain sentence without any logical backing or support.

For any argument to be reasonable or adequate, three factors are essential

a) Definition

b) Deductive reasoning

c) Inductive reasoning.

The given statement has a valid sentence but does not have any logical support (though it is correct)

Hence, option A is correct

3 0

3 years ago

I want to be tracer?

erastovalidia [21]

The answer is: Im already tracer

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers