The deputy governor can interpret the law, determine its constitutionality and apply it to individual cases in the supreme court.
<h3>
What is a Supreme court?</h3>
- The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the Supreme Court of Federal Jurisdiction in the United States.
- It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court actions and state court actions, including points of federal law.
- It also has its own jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, in particular "all cases involving ambassadors, other ministers of public service and consuls, and cases in which a State is said to be a party."
- The Court has powers of judicial review and has the power to find laws that violate any provision of the Constitution.
- It can also revoke executive orders that violate the Constitution or applicable law.
- However, it may only act in connection with matters within the area of law for which it has jurisdiction.
- The courts have ruled that they can adjudicate cases that have political implications, but that they have no authority to adjudicate unjustifiable political issues.
Thus, the deputy governor can interrupt the case in between and can appeal in the supreme court.
To know more about supreme court refer to:
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
The answer is a delusion.
Robert is exhibiting delusion due to his depressive disorder. A delusion is a kind or characteristically a symptom of mental disorder which made a person having a distinctive belief or impression that is positively maintained despite being opposed by what is generally accepted as reality or logical argument just like what Robert portrays.
The answer is They are fairly inflexible.
Explanation: An Algorithm is nothing more than a recipe that shows step by step the procedures required to solve a task.
More technically, an algorithm is a logical, finite, defined sequence of instructions that must be followed to solve a problem or perform a task.
We use algorithms intuitively and automatically daily when performing common tasks.
Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy, which gave a single person total power over the government and exempted the king from all checks and balances. On the other side, Locke endorsed a more liberal strategy for creating states.
What do the John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories of the social contract have in common?
Both Locke and Hobbes saw the social compact as being crucial to the political stability of a state. But each of these ideas was based on a very different understanding of human nature.
Why was Locke's viewpoint so much different than Hobbes?
The natural rules revealed by Locke exist in the state of nature, in opposition to Hobbes. Additionally, they are regarded as fundamental aspects of human nature since they violate people's right to personal freedom. A state of conflict is not the same as a state of nature.
Learn more about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories: brainly.com/question/1596903
#SPJ4
