Answer:
A. Authorities in New Orleans weren’t prepared for the chaos and destruction that would result from the levees breaking and the resulting flood.
F. Louisiana didn’t have the proper plans in place to respond to a disaster of this magnitude, and because of this they lost more citizens than expected.
Explanation:
These two statements (A and F) express the central idea of the text. What happens in the text <em>(2 levees fail, toll rises)</em> shows that NEW Orleans and Lousiana were not prepared and had no plans in place for disaster of that magnitude.
Option B is incorrect because residents and authorities were not expecting a flooding of such huge magnitude. Had they been expecting this, they would have either migrated or put proper plans in place before the hurricane.
Option C may be true but not correct, because the text is not talking about adequate warnings, or how loss of lives could be been avoided.
Option D is incorrect because there is no mention of volunteers and aid in the text.
Option E too may be true but not correct as text has no mention about efforts and problems to rescue the residents.
Answer:
because both the kings thought that they were ruining their kingdoms
Explanation:
my brother read this book, this was what he said
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Below is a section from a previous draft of Donovan's argumentative essay. What type of appeal is Donovan making in the underlined sentences? Georgia O'Keeffe became one of the most famous painters of all time by not doing what "the men" of her time expected of her. O'Keeffe had the courage to be creative in the face of constant criticism. If O'Keeffe sat down to take an IQ test today, she might very well draw her answers and end up with a poor score. But she would not care what the results of the test were! Answer choices for the above question A. This is an emotional appeal. B. This is repetition. C. This is an ethical appeal. D. This is a counter argument.
Answer:
D. This is a counter argument.
Explanation:
As we can see in the text shown above, the underlined phrase stands as an objection, a refutation to the argument previously said, which states that if O'Keeffe made a current IQ text, it would have a low score. This type of positioning is called a counter argument.
The counter-argument aims to counter a premise and not hinder its meaning. When the author of the text states that O'Keeffe would not do well in an IQ test, he opposes arguments showing that this would not tarnish the genius she possessed.
