1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marishachu [46]
3 years ago
12

As you analyze the editorial cartoon, look carefully at the literary devices and elements used in the cartoon. Apply the strateg

y to evaluate the effectiveness of the cartoon. Explain your evaluation and include details about the cartoon as support.

English
2 answers:
Alex_Xolod [135]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The cartoon is effective for several reasons. First, it is on a familiar topic. The overuse of tablets and smartphones is an issue that many people know about. Having a child with his face buried in a tablet satirizes the priorities of children today. Also, readers can easily grasp the cartoonist’s perspective that these gadgets keep us from enjoying the world around us. As the boy studies his tablet, he misses the total eclipse in the background. The cartoon is also amusing, which engages readers. At the same time, it makes us think and persuades us that children should use technology only on a limited basis.

Explanation:

Harlamova29_29 [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The cartoon is effective for several reasons. First, it is on a familiar topic. The overuse of tablets and smartphones is an issue that many people know about. Having a child with his face buried in a tablet satirizes the priorities of children today. Also, readers can easily grasp the cartoonist’s perspective that these gadgets keep us from enjoying the world around us. As the boy studies his tablet, he misses the total eclipse in the background. The cartoon is also amusing, which engages readers. At the same time, it makes us think and persuades us that children should use technology only on a limited basis.

Explanation:

- sample response for edgenuity

- make sure to rephrase!

:)

You might be interested in
In Monster, which feelings most likely lead to Mr. Sawicki’s challenging Petrocelli's view of Steve's character? A. fear and sym
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

its c

confidence & irritation

Explanation:

i just took the test

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which character relationship in The Tempest is the best example of how colonizers used language as power?
Salsk061 [2.6K]

The character relationship in The Tempest that is best example of how colonizers used language as power is A. Stephano and Trinculo referring to Caliban as their pet monster .

<h3>What is Language power?</h3>

Language power serves as a measure that is used to analyse the ability of a speaker to communicate effectively.

From the first, option, language power was used when describing the character "Caliban" who was been regarded as a monster.

brainly.com/question/15239761

learn more about Language power at;

6 0
2 years ago
Why does Walt not join in conversation between his wife and Skiff Miller
vekshin1

Skiff Miller wanted to take the dog back and go to Alaska with him i guess but to do this he would have to take it from the couple that took the dog in and took good care of it. Skiff Miller must have gotten attached to the dog and felt a sense of love and yeahh

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone help me with my 8th grade language arts IXL's <br><br> they have to be 100%
Olin [163]

Answer:

Whats the question tho?

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Tolstoy uses a third person omniscient point of view in the novella The Death Of Ivan Ilyich. Most of chapter 1 is narrated from
Mars2501 [29]

The Death of Ivan Ilyich uses a third person omniscient narration, so the narrator is able to describe the thoughts, actions, and motives of multiple characters. If the first four chapters of the novella were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view, her judgment and perspective would have clouded the way we see the thoughts, actions, and motives of the other characters. For example, if the section about Ivan Ilyich's funeral had been told from her perspective, the narration might have been overly focused on her apparent grief. But readers, privy to her internal thoughts, would also realize that she didn’t care much about her husband, in life or in death. She might have centered the narration around Ivan Ilyich's suffering, how even she suffered because of Ivan Ilyich's illness, and how it was better now that he was gone. She would describe the ordeal she went through in the last few days before Ivan Ilyich's death. Given her apparent selfish character, she might well have made it seem like she suffered more than Ivan himself.  

The account of their marriage would also have been different if told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's perspective. She would probably portray Ivan Ilyich as a suitable match for herself. She might focus on the fact that he was a successful magistrate from a good family with good character and fine dancing skills. She would describe their courtship, how she fell in love with him, and their marriage in greater detail. She might tell us how she was really happy to be married to him, at least initially, and describe the first few months of her marriage as beautiful and happy. She’d likely describe how being a mother was hard and demanding, made more difficult by a husband who wasn't supportive. She would describe her outrage when Ivan starts to spend more time with friends, at parties, and at bridge games, apparently to avoid her.

Her perspective about Ivan Ilyich's illness would also be very different from what we actually read in chapter 4 of the novella. She'd probably complain about how Ivan was trying to get attention by fussing about some trivial health problem. She'd feel that his illness was his fault because he wouldn’t follow the doctor's instructions and would eat and drink all the wrong things, while she had to bear the consequences of his "illness."

Some details from the first four chapters would also be missing if the story were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view. For example, we wouldn’t have known of Ivan Ilyich's colleagues' thoughts about and reactions to his death. Praskovya wasn't part of this discussion, and she obviously couldn’t read their minds. She wouldn't have been able to write about Peter Ivanovich's fears and thoughts about death. The details of Ivan Ilyich's early life would also vary depending on her knowledge of Ivan Ilyich's family and his childhood. She wouldn't have been able to describe what Ivan was going through after their marriage and the birth of their children because he wasn't sharing his thoughts and feelings with her. And lastly, she was probably clueless about Ivan Ilyich's health concerns and his fear of death because they didn't talk much about it.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Every driver must show proof of _____ insurance.
    11·1 answer
  • I need help ASAP I’m rlly bad at this
    15·2 answers
  • The movement called puritanism sought to purge the english church of all traces of?
    15·1 answer
  • What do you consider James McBride primary purpose in "hip hop planet"?
    5·1 answer
  • I struggled with its weight; I placed it partially in its destined position. But now there came from out the niche a low laugh t
    14·1 answer
  • Skills USA offers the opportunity to practice information technology skills.<br><br> True or False
    14·2 answers
  • Which genres are used in "The Leader in the Mirror"? Check all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • How do you think Scrooge changed his life after these experiences with the ghosts? Please write neatly. You may attach additiona
    7·1 answer
  • Identify which option in each of the following groups is punctuated correctly. During my first three months of work, I attended
    9·1 answer
  • Can somebody draw this please.?​
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!