1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paladinen [302]
3 years ago
11

How did the action and ruling in Briggs v. Elliott (1947-1952) have an effect on the strategy of the NAACP in arguing for the eq

ual treatment of African American schoolchildren?
A) The action and ruling was the first instance that the NAACP used the judicial system to argue the case for poor treatment of African Americans.
B) As a result of the action and ruling, the NAACP began lobbying members of the United States Congress to take legislative action to end segregation.
C) As a result of the action and ruling, the NAACP demanded President Truman issue an executive order calling for the immediate desegregation of public schools.
D) The action and ruling led to the NAACP arguing that segregated schools were fundamentally unequal, which became the basis for Brown v. Board
History
1 answer:
Bezzdna [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: D) The action and ruling led to the NAACP arguing that segregated schools were fundamentally unequal, which became the basis for Brown v. Board

Explanation:

Briggs v. Elliott was the first of five cases, jointly named Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka, Shawnee County, KS, et al., that challenged the constitutionality of racially segregated schools, with the help of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)

The court denied the petition to eliminate school segregation, although they did order the beginning of equalization in schools. This experience worked as an incentive for many other legal actions across the country, also sponsored by the NAACP.

You might be interested in
What did socrates belive came from ignorance?
maks197457 [2]

He among you is the wisest who, like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is really worth nothing at all.


What does it mean? Socrates spoke with a man who was said by many to be wise, but found that this man, like countless others he had spoken to, had no more wisdom than Socrates had, [and that the man even became angry and refused to acknowledge his ignorance when Socrates showed him that this was so,] and therefore Socrates concluded that "it seems I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think I know what I do not know".

In other words, despite that all Socrates knows is that he has no wisdom, his wisdom isn't really "worth nothing at all". That is the paradox of Socratic ignorance.

4 0
3 years ago
Agape is a greek word that has the same meaning in spanish and english. true false
Over [174]
The answer is false since there's different meanings
7 0
2 years ago
The united states of america was formally established under which document
OlgaM077 [116]
The article of Confederation
4 0
2 years ago
Why was the period between 1783 and 1788 called the "Critical Period" .
ss7ja [257]
Because "<span>the newly independent former colonies were beset with a wide array of foreign and domestic problems."</span>
6 0
2 years ago
Recently there has been discussion in the news about taxing junk food (soft drinks, for example) in an effort to reduce the inci
skelet666 [1.2K]

Answer:

Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its concern is mentioned.

Explanation:

  • Through me, the demand for amounts of unhealthy food seems to be inelastic in terms of costs. I acknowledge that as the cost goes up, consumers will consume less junk food, but perhaps the decrease in the supply is lower than that of the rising rise. It might be because, already though, substitutes for junk foods, particularly across the Us, are challenging to find. Unhealthy food is just the shortest and simplest meal to consume.
  • The reasoning here seems to be that every customer would have to purchase food even though the price rises by 1%, so consumption will still decrease by somewhere around 1%. So perhaps we can assume that quality does not influence quantities throughout the Junk Food industry.
  • The reduction of excess baggage would be small since it is inelastic. This symbolizes the corporation's low incompetence and as the cost is changed, the market for quantities is approximately the same, not so much impact.
  • I thought taxing junk foods, especially to maximize welfare spending, is a smart option. But obesity over here Is not going to help. The incorrect method for combating obesity as well as making our diets balanced is taxes. The irony is that all clients are impacted by taxes regardless of their weight status. The impact of food taxes is unclear and may result in the replacement of items that may comprise of calories that seem to be equivalent or higher.
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ancient Egypt was a polytheistic society what does that mean
    8·2 answers
  • How had the role of monasteries changed by the 1200s?
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes a similarity between a democracy and a republic
    11·2 answers
  • After World War I ended, the American economy
    11·1 answer
  • Prehistoric societies did not leave behind _____
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these BEST describes why the United States became involved in what is known as the Korean War?
    12·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court’s ruling in Scott v. Sandford
    13·1 answer
  • How did the civil war help new mexico become a state?​
    14·1 answer
  • Pressure to go to war with England in 1812 came from the...
    9·1 answer
  • Why would an author write about the Townshend acts before writing about the tea act?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!