The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.
<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>
Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.
Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.
They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.
Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.
#SPJ1
I don't think they were necessary justify even with everything going on at the time since it's targeted people who were suspected
Disease was the reason for the death of native Americans
<span> It was based on African trade The medium of exchange in the </span>pre-colonial economy<span> was A) The battery system B) The Battering system C) The barter system D) The US dollar One of </span>the major<span> underlying </span>
