The answer is D, equal treatment for women.
Answer:
The Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder, (2013) held that the coverage formula set forth in Section 4(b) of the Act was unconstitutional, and as a consequence, no jurisdictions are now subject to the coverage formula in Section 4(b) or to Sections 4(f)(4) and 5 of Act.
Explanation:
Answer:
I agree because it is true
Answer:
The British were able to undermine the advantage the French enjoyed by cutting off French shipping to the Americas. The patriots saw taxation as something that should be avoided, which they thought would threaten their prosperity and liberty. The patriots also saw themselves as equal to the British parliament.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
because the cuban was low on economic and Castro promised to close all the gaps
