Answer:
YXV- WZV- Congruent-Vertical- AA
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is the right answer,since this result is only observed 21% of the time, so in general it's not significant, so the first 2 are eliminated. The 2 x 0.21 doesn't matter since, the percent is 21% not 42%, so it doesn't even matter. The last question we eliminate is:"The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 79% of the time" 79% of the time is a pretty good amount to say it's significant, but it only says 21% of the time.So, it leaves us with:The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
Hope this helps lol (: is this a psat or somethin?
Homework help, vice versa. have fun!
You can see that every decade the income increases by 6,250. So if you want to do 5 years instead you would have to add 3,125 to the income of 1980 to find what the income was for 1985. Now you add 33,750+3,125= 36,875. The financial aid cutoff for 1985 would be $36,875.
