Answer:
Hedonism and utilitarianism are similar in their evaluation of the goal of moral behaviour as some version of pleasure or happiness and the minimization of its opposite. They can both view pleasure or happiness as simple and immediate, or complex and matured. Where they differ is the scope of evaluation which justifies the behaviour as moral. Hedonism tends to be individualistic while utilitarianism tends to be social. A utilitarian must evaluate the happiness result for the total consequence of an action, which typically effects many people. A hedonist could very well throw consequences to the wind if the action feels good to him or herself. In a sense, you might consider utilitarianism to be model for social hedonism.
Explanation:
They believed it to be apposing the teachings of god. This could also be considered as blasphemy against the church. in other words because the theory of evolution rivaled those of the church, therefore church was against the teaching of it. this is because they didn't want people to begin questioning the legitimacy of the church or their teachings.
Hope this helps, i would love a thanks :D
Answer:
to reduce competition for jobs
Explanation:
took the test
Answer:
the people
Explanation:
there will be democracy, the people shall vote and therein they shall not be pressurised. I hope this helps<u>.</u><u> </u><u>it's </u><u>my </u><u>pleasure</u><u> </u><u /><u> </u><u>helping </u><u>you</u>
