The answer is C, bad+ ease
Answer:
<em>Yes, but upto an extent</em>.
Explanation:
Including foreign workers with excellent proficiency in the corresponding field will not merely influence the productivity but it would inculcate their techniques, ideas which would be distinct from the ones being used in our nation and will also help to know about the work culture prevailing there. This would also be beneficial in order to blend the two nation's work advancements and culture to produce an entirely innovative thought or idea. <em>But too much inclusion will not only snatch the employment opportunities from our citizens but may also lead to the dependency on them and leaking of confidential information too. It will also lead to the slow down of the nation's economy.</em>
Answer:
I think that most of the claims listed above could be argued well with specific evidence from Thoreau's essay, but I would be a little suspicious of one of the claims and downright skeptical about another one. To me, Thoreau seems disturbed by the emphasis on technological "improvements" in his day, such as the telegraph and railroad, but does he really believe that technology is the "primary cause of distress"? Right now, I really don't know, so I would wait to see how well the writer could support this interpretation before I would make up my mind
Explanation:
there u go
C because there’s not enough conflict in this scenario
Older animals are usually surly and ill-tempered.- That can be a sentence in itself as well as the second part. Accordingly it is unwise to attempt to pet a grown raccoon. All the semicolon is doing is combining two sentences to make them one.
