U.S. leaders worked to improve relations with foreign countries to protect their access to natural resources reflects U.S. concerns regarding the Middle Eastin the 1970s
<u>Explanation:</u>
The United States stealing association in the Middle East started later, while the Truman management, and maintained for the 21st century. The United States was also assigned to the deadlock in the Middle East as a temporary suspension to the intentions of peace and Soviet containment. The origin of the Cold War launched the United States, the Soviet Union, and their particular beliefs into the region as well. The superpowers used the weakness and vulnerability of the Middle Eastern countries to improve their interests. Because of its strategic location and its requisite petroleum resources, the Middle East became the stage for an intense competition between the two superpowers. Using this chance he U.S expands its relation with foreign countries like Arab, Iraq etc to get control over natural resources.
1766-1122 BC or 1556-1046 BC. It depends on the source you go with.
<span>1. </span>The
correct answer here is D. Japan’s economy was in a great state after the World War
I but as the Great Depression hit so did the Japanese economy plummet. Japan has
a few national resources and relies mainly on import. Because of the Great Depression
the trade with the foreign nations was in ruins which led to the economic crisis.
Because Japan was lacking resources and land space they invaded Manchuria.
<span>2. </span>The
correct answer here is C. Both Italy and Japan believed that they were not
rewarded adequately for their efforts in the war. Both expected more territory
and were left wanting. This can be seen as one of the reasons why these
countries developed later as they did and sided with Germany in the WWII.
<span>4. </span>The
correct answer here is A. Unfortunately, the League of Nations was not very strong.
They had no army and the both Italy and Germany largely ignored their decrees.
The League of Nations reacted the only way it could and that was by imposing sanctions
and enforcing trade embargoes on these states.
It seems that you have missed the given options for this question, but anyway, here is the answer. The conditions wherein the government should be changed is when the people become dissatisfied with it and that, <span>when it fails to grant people their rights. The government's service is always for the people. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for.</span>