1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashutka [201]
3 years ago
13

What was the significance, other than the obvious harm to US forces, of the terror attack on the USS Cole in 2000? A. It demonst

rated that bin Laden and al-Qaeda were not intimidated by the United States' reprisal for their terrorist acts. B. Its small size and force indicated that al-Qaeda's resources were being worn down by the US military. C. It demonstrated that bin Laden's control over al-Qaeda was incontrovertible, because the attackers identified themselves as bin Laden's servants just before the explosion. D. Its coordination and successful use of underwater rocketry demonstrated that al-Qaeda's strength and use of technology were growing along with the terror movement.
History
2 answers:
LenaWriter [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A. The significance of the terror attack on the USS Cole in 2000, other than the obvious harm to US forces, was that it demonstrated that Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were not intimidated by the United States' reprisal for their terrorist acts.

Explanation:

The attack on USS Cole was a terrorist attack on the US Navy ship USS Cole on 12 October 2000 in the port of Aden in Yemen, in which seventeen Americans lost their lives. The attack was perpetrated by the Al-Qaeda terror group.

The attack had a clear message: Al Qaeda was willing to carry out a large-scale and sustained war against the United States, and was not intimidated by American reprisals. This was confirmed with the Attacks of September 11, a year later.

Inessa05 [86]3 years ago
5 0

A or D, both of these sound correct

You might be interested in
Which statement reflects U.S. concerns regarding the Middle Eastin the 1970s?
horsena [70]

U.S. leaders worked to improve relations with foreign countries to protect their access to natural resources reflects U.S. concerns regarding the Middle Eastin the 1970s

<u>Explanation:</u>

The United States stealing association in the Middle East started later, while the Truman management, and maintained for the 21st century. The United States was also assigned to the deadlock in the Middle East as a temporary suspension to the intentions of peace and Soviet containment. The origin of the Cold War launched the United States, the Soviet Union, and their particular beliefs into the region as well.  The superpowers used the weakness and vulnerability of the Middle Eastern countries to improve their interests.  Because of its strategic location and its requisite petroleum resources, the Middle East became the stage for an intense competition between the two superpowers.  Using this chance he U.S expands its relation with foreign countries like Arab, Iraq etc to get control over natural resources.

3 0
3 years ago
In what time period did the shang dynasty exsist
yaroslaw [1]
1766-1122 BC or 1556-1046 BC. It depends on the source you go with.
8 0
3 years ago
What is the practice of controlling weaker countries all over the world?
inessss [21]

Answer:

Neocolonialism

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
1. which of the following actions did japan take in an attempt to recover from the great depression?
laila [671]

<span>1.      </span>The correct answer here is D. Japan’s economy was in a great state after the World War I but as the Great Depression hit so did the Japanese economy plummet. Japan has a few national resources and relies mainly on import. Because of the Great Depression the trade with the foreign nations was in ruins which led to the economic crisis. Because Japan was lacking resources and land space they invaded Manchuria.

<span>2.      </span>The correct answer here is C. Both Italy and Japan believed that they were not rewarded adequately for their efforts in the war. Both expected more territory and were left wanting. This can be seen as one of the reasons why these countries developed later as they did and sided with Germany in the WWII.

<span>4.      </span>The correct answer here is A. Unfortunately, the League of Nations was not very strong. They had no army and the both Italy and Germany largely ignored their decrees. The League of Nations reacted the only way it could and that was by imposing sanctions and enforcing trade embargoes on these states.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under what conditions should government should be changed
hram777 [196]
It seems that you have missed the given options for this question, but anyway, here is the answer. The conditions wherein the government should be changed is when the people become dissatisfied with it and that, <span>when it fails to grant people their rights. The government's service is always for the people. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for.</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The domestication of plants led to more stationary settlements during the First Agricultural Revolution. Please select the best
    9·2 answers
  • What is the value of -10-(-4.2)​
    7·2 answers
  • What new economic practice of the 1920s was credited with being responsible for people buying more?
    13·1 answer
  • What theory promoted by Stephen Douglas would allow the people of a territory to allow or forbid slavery?
    7·1 answer
  • The photo is of Gregory "Pappy" Boyington, a combat pilot during world war 2.
    5·1 answer
  • Need help, someone !!!!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • What is the answer for this
    12·2 answers
  • How was wealth distributed in Mesopotamia?
    5·1 answer
  • What mood is the song "You'll be Back" setting?
    7·1 answer
  • Following the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel gained control over all of the following territories EXCEPT which one?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!