Hey!
----------------------------------------------------
Part A:
When Samara came up with the idea of creating a new park she didn't know anything about how she would come up with an idea and presenting it to the zoning board.
----------------------------------------------------
Part B:
What I said above is what the answer is to Part B. If Samara wouldn't have gone to the library to learn how you would present an idea to the zoning board she would have never been able to create the park at all.
----------------------------------------------------
Hope This Helped! Good Luck!
The general answer given below about the passage "Indifference the, is not only a sin, it is a punishment" is likely to help you answer the question. The reason for this general answer is that I was unable to find the answer choices for this question online:
- In his speech "The Perils of Indifference," Elie Wiesel discusses how apathy in front of human suffering can lead to a tragedy.
- By saying that indifference is a punishment, he means that being indifferent (doing nothing) when seeing others suffering is the same as hurting them.
- When we do not help a victim, we are siding with the criminal. When we do not feed the hungry or aide the sick, we are watching them die. Therefore, indifference is as cruel as hurting others.
- Elie Wiesel is a survivor of the Holocaust. Therefore, he knows what it feels like to be beaten, starved, tortured and have no one at all help you.
- Wiesel knows, thus, how awful indifference is. As he suffered in the hands of the Nazi, he wondered why no one did anything to help.
- Why didn't other countries intervene to free the prisoners? Why were people watching millions of people die, killed by a cruel regime, without doing anything to stop it?
- In "The Perils of Indifference," Wiesel condemns inaction, apathy, inertia.
- According to him, <u>doing nothing is as good as harming</u>. If you don't help, you contribute to the suffering.
- The only one who gains something from indifference is the criminal, the aggressor.
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/2429867
Answer:
Two Family disputes
Explanation:
The two lovers were from different families, who didn't like each other. Kinda like Romeo and Juliet. One family didn't want their daughter marrying the other one, and the opposite side fought back
Here what i think idk if i got the right story but hey i read storys all the time <span>n 1852, when prestigious Alabama plantation owner Cornelius Allen gives his daughter Clarissa's hand in marriage, she takes with her a gift: Sarah—her slave and her half-sister. Raised by an educated mother, Clarissa is not the proper Southern belle she appears to be, with ambitions of loving whom she chooses. Sarah equally hides behind the façade of being a docile house slave as she plots to escape. Both women bring these tumultuous secrets and desires with them to their new home, igniting events that spiral into a tale beyond what you ever imagined possible. Told through the alternating viewpoints of Sarah and Theodora Allen, Cornelius' wife, Marlen Suyapa Bodden's The Wedding Gift is an intimate portrait of slavery and the 19th Century South.</span><span>
</span>
An arguments focus is always presented in its introduction.
