Answer:
The three sentences with ambiguous or incorrect use of adverbs include:
We ended the game quickly running home.
Our food is running out now we have to go to the store.
Always, the winners are Kurt and Gerald.
Explanation:
This is because, it is ambiguous sentences due to lack of understanding of what the sentences is trying to pass across. Or incorrect sentences due to its incorrect placement and agreement of the adverb with other parts of the sentences.
Answer:
The correct answer is d
Explanation:
they spelled the word “cite” wrong so it doesn’t mean the SIght u see
We can combine the two sentences by making the second sentence an adjective clause as "Forests cover 31% of Ohio, which has at least 99 tree species."
<h3>What is an adjective clause?</h3>
We can define an adjective clause as having the following characteristics:
- It is a dependent or subordinate clause.
- It contains a subject and a predicate.
- It often begins with relative pronouns, such as "which" or "that".
- It functions like an adjective, providing information about a noun.
In order to combine the sentences provided in the question and make the second sentence an adjective clause, we simply replace the noun "Ohio" with a relative pronoun. Thus:
- Sentence 1: Forests cover 31% of Ohio.
- Sentence 2: Ohio has at least 99 tree species.
- Combined sentences: Forests cover 31% of Ohio, which has at least 99 tree species.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about adjective clauses here:
brainly.com/question/1047465
#SPJ1
Answer and Explanation:
In the short story "Marigolds", by Eugenia Collier, the narrator lives in a poor black community. The story takes place during the Great Depression that devastated the United States in the 1930's. <u>Even though there were people who said "prosperity... was 'just around the corner,'" the narrator and her community knew better than to believe those words. They had always been poor. Their hard work never paid off. Those words, according to the narrator, "were white folks’ words." Maybe prosperity would return to white people soon, but the narrator's community had never seen or had it; the American Dream never came true for them. How can they believe those words if the people who say such words are the ones who exploit their work?</u>
