The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.
<em>The results of a government </em><u><em>NOT ADHERING</em></u><em> to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.</em>
The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.
So The results of a government <em><u>NOT ADHERING</u></em> to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.
The correct sequence of answers are listed below:
1. Watts Riots - Riot broke in Los Angeles over the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (answer in number 2)
2. Voting Rights Act of 1965
3. Detroit - worse riots occurred in this city
The second choice is correct
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say that yes, written history is recorded from a variety of perspectives.
In this factor lies the richness of historic research because each author, each historian has a particular optic or point of view that allows it to establish its own thesis or research approach. This means that different authors can have different perspectives and use different sources to explain a historic event or incident. The result of this is that we, as humans, have options to better understand past events and how they influenced our present.