Answer:a debit to Cost of Goods Sold and a credit to Merchandise Inventory for $217
( The answer Is not in the options given)
Explanation:
The Perpetual inventory is a method of accounting for inventory which immediately records when an inventory is sold or purchased using the available point-of-sale software systems of the particular business.
In that regard , the entry to record cost of merchandise sold
Account titles Debit Credit
Cost of goods (Merchandise sold) $217
Merchandise Inventory $217
Answer:
a-1) Pv = 52549
a-2) Pv = 56822
b-1) Fv = 77570
b-2 Fv = 83878
Explanation:
b-1) Future value:
S= Sum of amount of annuity=?
n=number of fixed periods=5 years
R=Fixed regular payments=13200
i=Compound interest rate= .081 (suppose annualy)
we know that ordinary annuity:
S= R [(1+i)∧n-1)]/i
= 13200[(1+.081)∧5-1]/.081
=13200(1.476-1)/.081
= 13200 * 5.8765
S = 77570
a.1)Present value of ordinary annuity:
Formula: Present value = C* [(1-(1+i)∧-n)]/i
=13200 * [(1-(1+.081)∧-5]/.081
=13200 * (1-.6774)/.081
=13200 * (.3225/.081)
=52549
a.2)Present value of ordinary Due:
Formula : Present value = C * [(1-(1+i)∧-n)]/i * (1+i)
= 13200 * [(1- (1+.081)∧-5)/.081 * (1+.081)
= 13200 * 3.9822 * 1.081
= 56822
b-2) Future value=?
we know that: S= R [(1+i)∧n+1)-1]/i ] -R
= 13200[ [ (1+.081)∧ 5+1 ]-1/.081] - 13200
= 13200 (.5957/.081) -13200
= (13200 * 7.3544)-13200
= 97078 - 13200
= 83878
The answer is true.
hope this helped :)
Please give the options in order for us to determine which is best.
Answer:
C) The invisible hand
Explanation:
Daniel here seeking to produce and increase his welfare is "led by an invisible hand" to negotiate with his suppliers and to sell goods to his neighbors in a way that everybody is better off as a result from these transactions.
This is also a clear example to what Adam Smith was referring to the invisible hand:
"in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was not part of it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. " Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 4, Chapter 2
