1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kumpel [21]
4 years ago
9

A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would

cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10.33 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $63 million, and the expected net cash inflows would be $21 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 10%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation.

Business
1 answer:
IgorLugansk [536]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

With mitigation: NPV =$36,670,000, IRR= 15,24%

Without mitigation: NPV= $ 42,000,000, IRR= 19,86%

Explanation:

To calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) we have to sum the present value of a project´s cash flows (positive and negative cashflows). To do so, we need: the number of periods of the project, the discount rate, cost of captal  or WACC, and the future values of the cash flows. Then we apply the formula attached.

To calculate the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) we have to find the discount rate, cost of capital or WACC that makes the NPV equal to cero. That means we have to find a rate in which the investor do not create or destroy value, only recovers the investment. I attached the formula.

But, this is better if we use excel:

First we copy the cash flows of the two projects. To find the NPV we use the financial formula "NPV" in this way:

"=NPV(rate;cash flows from year 1 to year 5)+ cash flow of year 0"

To find the IRR we use the financial formula "IRR" in this way:

"=IRR(cash flows from year 0 to year 5)"

I attached the excel figure.

You might be interested in
Suzie has $16,000 in her investment account today. She saves $500 a quarter and earns 8% interest compounded quarterly. How much
andrezito [222]

Suzie has  $26,997.90  in her account three years from now in her investment.

An investment is an asset or object obtained with the intention of generating profits or appreciation. Appreciation refers to an increase within the fee of an asset over time. when an individual purchases an excellent as an funding, the rationale isn't always to eat the good however alternatively to use it inside the future to create wealth.

investment = $16000

FV = future value

PV = present value = 16,000

r = interest rate = 8% / 4 = 2% per quarter

n = number of quarters = 3 * 4 = 12

The future value of the single investment is:

FV=PV∗(1+r)n

FV=16,000∗(1+0.02)12

FV=$20,291.86

Annuity of $500 per quarter

Let

FVA be the future value of the annuity

PMT be the periodic payment

The future value of the annuity is:

FVA = PMT × (1+r)ⁿ - 1 / r

       = 500 × (1+ 0.02)¹² - 1 /0.02

      = $6,706.04

After 3 years, her account balance will be the sum of these two future values:

Balance = FV + FVA = 20,291.86 + 6,706.04 = 26,997.90

Suzie will have $26,997.90 in her account.

Learn more about investment here:-brainly.com/question/25300925

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
If the net present value of a project is positive (non-zero), then the project's:________.a) PI will be less than 1. b) internal
Mariana [72]

Answer:

b) internal rate of return will exceed its required rate of return.

Explanation:

The internal rate of return is the discount rate at which the NPV = 0. If the NPV is positive when calculated using the project's discount rate, then the IRR is going to be higher than the discount rate.

Option A is wrong because the profitability index (PI) of a project is calculated by dividing the present value of its cash flows by its cost. If the NPV is positive, it means that the present value of its cash flows will be greater than the costs, so the pI will be more than 1.

Option C is wrong because if the costs exceed the benefits, then the NPV will be negative.

Option D is wrong because that would mean that the NPV is negative.  

Option E is something made up that doesn't make any sense.

5 0
3 years ago
Suppose a firm has 15 million shares of common stock outstanding and six candidates are up for election to five seats on the boa
jasenka [17]

Answer:

Consider the following calculations

Explanation:

a.) Under cumulative voting scenario,

Total number of votes available = Common Shares Outstanding × No of directors

                                            = 15 x 5 million

                                            = 75 million

As there are six candidates for the five board positions, the five candidates with highest number of votes will be elected to the board and the candidate with the least total votes will not be elected.

Minimum votes needed to ensure election =1/6 x 75 million + 1 vote to break any ties

                                                              = 12,500,001 votes

If one candidate receives 12,500,001 votes, the leftover is total 62,499,999 votes.

No matter how these votes are spread over the remaining 5 director candidates, it is impossible for each of the 5 to receive more than 12,500,001. This would require more than 5 × 12,500,001 votes, or more than the remaining 62,499,999 votes.

b.) Now, in case of straight voting,

Vote on board of directors occurs one director at a time.

=> Number of votes eligible for each director = Number of Shares Outstanding = 15,000,000

Minimum number of votes needed to ensure election is through simple majority i.e. = 15,000,000/2 + 1 = 7,500,001 votes

8 0
3 years ago
Select all that apply.
ahrayia [7]
B
Hope this helpssss
7 0
3 years ago
What are two reasons to save instead of invest?
aliya0001 [1]
Safety and liquidity. Liquidity means the ability to use it at a moments notice and if saved that is possible whereas if invested that may not always be the case. If invested you won’t be able to use the funds immediately or at least you aren’t guaranteed that you can without a delay. The other imp reason is safety. If you save your money it is safe and retains its value but if invested it’s value can fluctuate which you tolerate and expect in the hopes that over time it will earn you more money.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ​commitments to make or receive payments in the future are made easier by money's function as a _____.
    11·1 answer
  • Under the Equal Pay Act:
    13·1 answer
  • Suppose a stock market crash makes people feel poorer this decrease in wealth would induce people to desire __________. a decrea
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of an open-ended question?Answers:a. Do you want to have children?b. Would you consider ado
    14·2 answers
  • Suppose that a chicken farm uses a nearby stream to dispose of the wastes released by its chickens. These wastes flow downstream
    7·1 answer
  • Jamila conducts a job analysis focused on collecting very detailed information about the knowledge, skills, abilities, and other
    10·1 answer
  • The Keynesian view of economics assumes that:
    5·1 answer
  • Imagine you are the executive of a marketing company. Beginning this year, the company will begin conducting an in-house course
    8·1 answer
  • How many kalamata olives come on a whole salad? Enter the exact number.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following institutions may be owned by shareholders OR members?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!