Answer:
The disposal resulted was at D. No gain or loss
Explanation:
The gain or loss on disposal on a fixed asset is calculated by comparing the sales proceeds from disposing off the asset and the carrying value of the asset.
The carrying value of the asset is its net book value which is calculated as follows,
Carrying value = Cost - Accumulated depreciation
If the carrying value is equal to the sales proceeds from disposal, there is no gain or loss.
The carrying value of copy machine was = 45000 - 44000 = $1000
The sales proceeds were also $1000
Thus, gain/loss on disposal = 1000 - 1000 = $0
Thus, there was no gain or loss on disposal.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Reduction of cost basis per share.
When you take a look at some of the rules that IRS has, you see that stock dividends do not get taxsd at the time of receipt. They don't get taxed because, the shareholder does not receive anything from the company, only but a hope on any increased future share price increment or appreciation.
Answer:1. Make provision for warranty claims.
2. Disclosure of contingent liability
3. No cost should be recorded.
Explanation:
Warranty is an assurance made by firms to make good any agreed loss that is incurred by the customers in usage of goods and services whiting the period of the warranty. Since an estimation can be made based on firms history of sales a provision has to be made for possible warranty.
Since it's only probably that a loss will be Incurred by the firm by going into the contract and the financial statement has not been issue the firm should made a contingent liability disclosure in the report.
The self insurance is not a contract with a third party, in this vein no cost will be accrued until the loss is actually suffered.
Answer: I will vote in favor of the bill.
Explanation:
Based on the above scenario, I would vote in favor of the bill. The argument here is in the case of bankruptcy, if an individual is willing to pay their dues but because of unavoidable financial circumstances, the individual seeks more time or other assistance which can help so that the person will later pay. I believe it's a good idea which should be supported by the law.
The court should have the right to decide terms of mortgages to help debtors in order for them to pay their debts in future rather than forcing them to leave the house. It will also help the country deal with issue of facilitating housing to maximum number of individuals.
In my opinion, the judge's decision should be given prime importance as the judge must evaluate the intention of the debtor and the capability of the debtor to pay the debts
