Answer:
Language
Explanation:
A language is a system that is a combination of arbitrary symbols that can produce an infinite number of meaningful statements. Language defined by the Britannica Encyclopedia is “a system of conventional spoken or written symbols that has meaning to the participants of a specific culture”. As stated before, we use different symbols to create a word that means something to us. Each symbol has each own pronunciation as well as each word. The most interesting part is that each language is very different from each other. There are other symbols and other meanings to words. In conclusion, we can state that with language we have an infinite form of communication; we just need to learn the rules of each language.
Answer:
b.Asian-Americans are perceived as stoic and unemotional, but they are the most emotionally expressive and demonstrative minority group.
Explanation:
All over the world dıfferent group of people tends to have an opınıon about another partıcular distinct grup as a result of the sterotype that has been formed over the years.
In america, the Asia-American tends to be percieved as people that are stoic and unemotional as a result of their facial structures and impresion made when the refused in showing emotions over something. On the otherhand, it turns out that they are actually the most emotionally expressive and demonstrative minority group when looked closer. the initial impression was strictly a sterotype that was formed about them.
Answer:
France saw Indigenous nations as allies, and relied on them for survival and fur trade wealth. Indigenous people traded for European goods, established military alliances and hostilities, intermarried, sometimes converted to Christianity, and participated politically in the governance of New France
Explanation:
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.