Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
The option for saving money which typically offers the most liquidity is D. a basic savings account.
Liquidity refers to the fact that you can withdraw your money anytime you want.
Correct answer: "<span>C. a situation in which quantity demanded is greater than quantity supplied"
Shortage is also referred to as excess demand - meaning that there is a greater demand than what there is to give. The opposite concept would be economic surplus.
</span>Example: when the need for food in a certain village is greater than what is supplied or produced in that village, there a shortage of food.
Partly this statement is true however this does not implies to all.
In a big company, it;s really the top managers who do all the planning and decision making for the good of the company and then cascade it to the lower level for implementations
