Answer:
Hi there~
The answer would be:
(First of, I don't really know the movie but I'm gonna try to answer it for you.)
Starr spoke the truth about how she felt after the lady that wanted Starr to be on television and speak about it.
Even though she was scared at first, she decided it was the right decision to speak up, even if it means sacrificing everything in her neighborhood.
Hope this helps
Minisugarr
The effect of Gatsby reaching through the dark setting toward the light is that it creates mystery and interest. Hence, The correct statement is Option B.
<h3>What do you know about the Greenlight?</h3>
One of the maximum arresting images in The Great Gatsby is Nick's imaginative and prescient of Gatsby stretching his palms out toward a small inexperienced mild on the other shore of the bay.
The mysterious, nearly mystical nature of this gesture is a sure-fire signal that this green light is a symbol.
Therefore, The effect of Gatsby reaching through the dark setting toward the light is that it creates mystery and interest. The correct statement is Option B.
learn more about greenlight:
brainly.com/question/10515042
#SPJ1
Answer:
Ad hominem attack
Explanation:
A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning.
Ad hominem (literally translated as <em>to the person</em>) is a type of logical fallacy in which a person criticizes or attacks another person, rather than what they are saying. Here, the speaker doesn't critize the mentioned poem. They don't give explanations about why the poem is not good. They simply attack the writer, stating that they are a sick and morbid person. That is not a valid reason as to why someone shouldn't read a poem.
Answer
Macbeth is not at peace because, in order to become a king, he murdered the previous king, Duncan. Not only does this murder make Macbeth consumed with guilt, but it triggers a series of events that make him feel more and more uneasy. Macbeth later murders Banquo, convinced that he also represents a threat to his power, while Duncan's son plots a revenge against Macbeth.
The phrase whether they would or not means that they were were tasked with the responsibility of carrying out the obligation against their will.
The phrase tells us that the Lords had no say on the tasks that they were asked to do. They were to accompany the rebels, they had no deciding power here.
This shows that their will has been taken from them. The person who is sending them on this errand has absolute power over them.
Read more on brainly.com/question/25535825?referrer=searchResults
