The safeguarding of fundamental human rights is crucial for democratic functioning since it is a core tenant of liberal democracy that all citizens are created equal.
<h3>
What are human rights?</h3>
Human rights are ethical precepts or rules for particular expectations of human behaviour and are usually safeguarded by domestic and international law. They are usually interpreted as unalienable, fundamental rights that all people, regardless of age, ethnicity, geography, language, religion, or any other status, are "inherent in all human beings" and to which they are "inherently entitled simply because they are a human being." They are universal in the sense that they apply anywhere and they are egalitarian in the sense that everyone is subject to them. They are thought to entail empathy, the application of the law, and a requirement that people respect the human rights of others.
To learn more about human rights, visit:
brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ1
Answer:
The founders set the terms for ratifying the Constitution. They bypassed the state legislatures, reasoning that their members would be reluctant to give up power to a national government. Instead, they called for special ratifying conventions in each state. Ratification by 9 of the 13 states enacted the new government.
Hull House was a settlement place co founded by 1889 by Jane Addams and Ellen Gates Starr.
The Whig theory, put into place after the Glorious Revolution, put a premium on the idea of civic virtue, placing the public good above personal interest. To promote such virtue, one needed a society in which property ownership was widespread. An agricultural nation, where farming was thought to encourage honesty, frugality, and independence, was less likely to become corrupt than a society dependent on commerce and manufacturing. In an agrarian society, politics would be less fractious because everyone's interest would be similar. In such a society representatives would be less fractious because everyone's interest would be similar. In such a society representatives would be equally affected by whatever laws they passed. This would prevent them from tyrannizing over the people by passing oppressive laws.
<span>The Whig view of politics was not democratic. It assumed that only men who owned property had a sufficient permanent stake in society to be trusted to vote.</span>
