Nearly 40 of these passengers were Protestant Separatists–they called themselves “Saints”–who hoped to establish a new church in the New World. Today, we often refer to the colonists who crossed the Atlantic on the Mayflower as “Pilgrims.”
They decide to move to the New World for they found the Church of England to be corrupt and idolatrous as the Catholic Church.
Explanation:
In 1608, a group of protestant separatists left their country of England to move to the New World of America in hopes of building a new community devoid of the corrupt and idolatrous community in England. They refused to be associated to the Church of England and also to the Catholic Church.
'The Separatists', as they were known, were critical of the Church of England and their ways. So they separated from it, detaching themselves from the Church and came to America, the "New World" in hopes of starting a new life across the Atlantic. Sailing from Plymouth, these group of "Saints" were transported in a merchant ship "The Mayflower", they reached a deserted Indian settlement which they renamed "Plymouth" from their starting point. These people moved to the New World in hopes of restarting a new life and also to begin a new and better religious as well as societal community away from the English Church and Catholic Church rules.
Answer: The Prologue points out that Romeo and Juliet have fate against them. It says that their love is "death-marked," and they have no control over what happens. It is their misfortune that leads to the sorrowful and tragic ending of the play.
Umm.... i cant support. it cause i don't have the article but i think perfectly preserved is it was kept and cared for and maintained and this was done perfectly
Rainsford won the wager. He fought Rainsford in the bedroom and Zaroff got fed to his own dogs. I suppose when Rainsford is in a tree and reflects that this is how an animal must feel to be hunted tips us off that he has a new attitude. The story, however, is so bizarre that the theme isn't dealt with in any depth. Perhaps Rainsford might think a little more about hunting defenseless animals in the future but I doubt he would start an animal rights movement.
