1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shalnov [3]
2 years ago
5

How might the United States and Mexico be different if the two countries had gone to war in 1916

History
1 answer:
Margarita [4]2 years ago
5 0
They would have been fighting each other
You might be interested in
How did the British reacted to Pontiac's Rebellion
Juliette [100K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Relations between British colonists and Native Americans, which had been severely strained during the French and Indian War, reached a new low during Pontiac's Rebellion. ... The British government also came to the conclusion that colonists and Native Americans must be kept apart.

7 0
3 years ago
Feudalism developed because European monarchs wanted to
Ivahew [28]
The Puritans also influenced the economic well-being of the colonies by ... One particular value held by the Puritans that can still be seen today is their sense of religious ... as collective, self-government within each community or settlement. ... Their belief in self-government gave them local control over both
6 0
3 years ago
What was the primary purpose of a stamp act<br>​
kirza4 [7]

Answer:

<h3>American colonists and required them to pay a tax on every piece of printed paper they used. Ship's papers, legal documents, licenses, newspapers, other publications, and even playing cards were taxed.</h3>
7 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt below from the Supreme Court ruling in the Scott v. Sandford. [T]he legislation and histories of the times, and
omeli [17]
The main point of this excerpt is that African-Americans were not considered US citizens.

In the Supreme Court case Dred Scott vs. Sandford, Scott is suing for his freedom from slavery. This is because his master brought him to the Wisconsin territory, a territory where slavery was outlawed.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against him. The reason why they ruled against him is based on the excerpt above. The Declaration of Independence did not make it blatantly clear that slaves were considered citizens. Since they were not considered citizens, they had no legal rights that slave owners had to respect.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is Rome civilianisation better or the Viking’s?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

Both were strong at their peaks, but seeing how the vikings were much more used to the sea life and raiding, and how the peak of roman military was extremely focused on conquests, i would say the romans would beat them. But in a water battle, vikings probably take the cake.

hope it helps you

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please helppp it’s important
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following actions is an example of periodization?
    8·2 answers
  • What impact did the rise of Christianity have on the intellectual life of Europe, both eastern and western, through the seventh
    8·1 answer
  • Why might Franklin see hope as impractical or even dangerous?
    14·1 answer
  • “...while Great Britain did give-in to threats of war, the agreement was fair and equitable. Neither nation had a clear legal ti
    6·1 answer
  • Who was revers riding partner
    9·2 answers
  • The Swahili coast was a marketplace for traders from which locations? Check all that apply. 1. Arabia 2. Asia 3. Australia 4. No
    7·1 answer
  • Women during the industrial Revolution enjoyed more
    12·2 answers
  • 11. Robert Boyle is best known for laying the basis for this study of science.
    8·1 answer
  • WHat is the answer to this question
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!