Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
Maybe you should draw a guy in a car buckling up and a sign saying click it or ticket
Design your survey carefully; use well-trained staff and proven techniques.
Develop a relationship with respondents. ...
Send reminders to respond.
Offer incentives to respond.
Keep surveys short.
Brainliest?
Social epidemiology is a branch of epidemiology that focuses particularly on the effects of social-structural factors on states of health. Social epidemiology assumes that the distribution of advantages and disadvantages in a society reflects the distribution of health and disease.
-Google
Answer: The correct answer: The periods of apostasy. The judges and the nation's the Israelites were delivered from
1.From the Mesopotamians ---------- Otoniel
2.from the Moabites ---------- Ehud
3.from the Philistines ---------- Samson
4.from the Canaanites ---------- Deborah
5. from the Midianites ----------- Gideon
6. from the Ammonites ----------- Jephtah
7. from the Philistines after forty years Samson ----------- Shamgar
