Yes i do pay attention to the price on the stocks on the stock market, it benefits me to do so because it helps me keep track of my purchase:)
Answer:
B. decision styles are consistent among top managers
Explanation:
Decision making styles differ between managers. Many managers exercise autocratic style which is authoritative wherein very limited inputs from the subordinates are taken and there is little scope for constructive advises.
In heuristic style, the strategies help managers to take clear cut decisions in a prompt manner. In such a form, decisions are arrived at quickly.
Managerial decision making methods differ from manager to manager and are an outcome of managers own judgement and demeanor.
Hence it is evident from above points that decision styles are not consistent among top managers.
The members of OPEC that would be in favor of high prices due to the small oil reserves that they have would be the countries in Africa
- Ecuador
- Angola
- Tunisia
- Gabon
<h3>What is OPEC?</h3>
This is an organization of the petroleum producing countries of the world.
Due to a rise in the oil prices now, these nations would most likely be favored in the sales of their products
Read more on OPEC here: brainly.com/question/26412451
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
