Answer and Explanation:
The matching is given below:
1. Historical cost: Historical cost is the cost that should be shown in the balance sheet. It is known as the real cost or original cost
hence, the correct option is C
2. Current cost: The current cost is the cost that should be incurred for the acquisition of an asset
Therefore the correct option is A
3. Net realizable value: The net realizable value is the value that could be determined by deducting any direct cost from the sale value also it would be use for pay off the liabilities
Therefore the correct option is D
4. Present value of future cash flows: The present value would be discounted at the particular rate of the market
Therefore the correct option is E.
5. Current market price: The amount of money that would be received when the asset is sold
Hence, the correct option is B.
Available options:
A. determine the sequence in which customers will be called on.
B. use existing transportation facilities.
C. minimize non-selling time.
D. determine duration of sales calls.
E. provide salespeople with an opportunity to plan their own routes and schedules
Answer:
Option C. Minimizing non-selling time.
Explanation:
The reason is that sales reps must lower their non selling time as this makes them inefficient for the company and would also increase their loss of time and commission. So every sales representative acknowledges his primary goal to decrease the non selling time which means he is trying to make sale.
Answer:
$88,382.67
Explanation:
Here is the complete question:
Sally makes deposits into a retirement account every year from the age of 30 until she retires at age 65.If Sally deposits $1200 per year and the account earns interest at a rate of 4% per year, compounded annually, how much will she have in the account when she retires?
To calculate the future value of the annuity, we use this formula: amount x annuity factor
Annuity factor = {[(1+r) ^N ] - 1} / r
Amount = $1200
R = interest rate = 4%
N = number of years = 35
=( 1.04^35 - 1) / 0.04 = 73.652225
73.652225 × $1200 = $88,382.67
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
a) DuPont analysis for Johnson International
2013: 0.059 x 2.11 x 1.75 = 0.2179 = 21.79%
2014: 0.058 x 2.18 x 1.75 = 0.2213 = 22.13%
2015: 0.049 x 2.34 x 1.85 = 0.2121 = 21.21%
b) DuPont analysis for industry averages
2013: 0.054 x 2.05 x 1.67 = 0.2121 = 21.21%
2014: 0.047 x 2.13 x 1.69 = 0.1692 = 16.92%
2015: 0.041 x 2.15 x 1.64 = 0.1446 = 14.46%
c) Johnson International's drivers follow the same tendency as the industry's average, e.g. net profit margin decreased in a similar manner, and total asset turnover increased also in a similar manner to the industry's average. The only driver that doesn't follow the industry's trend is financial leverage. While other companies in the same industry decreased their financial leverage, Johnson increased it. You should further analyze why this happened and what are the potential consequences.
Explanation:
The DuPont analysis is used to break down ROE into 3 different components and that way you can analyze whether a company's high ROE comes along with a high risk. The following formula is used to calculate ROE based on 3 different factors:
R
OE = net pro
fit margin x total assets turnover x financial leverage
