A rebuttal is a sort of countering something. For an author to cause his reply to become more grounded, he should point a rundown of defects on the given contention to balance it.
<h3>How can the writer revise the rebuttal to make it stronger? </h3>
Correct answer is option A.
- By rephrasing it as a conclusion.
- This will make it harder for the person who gave the assertion difficult to safeguard the case the individual in question is attempting to shield.
- The counterclaim has one significant component that the rejoinder doesn't, which is a solid and obvious source that upholds their position. In this way, the compose can make their reply more grounded by adding a measurement or citation.
Therefore, correct answer is option A.
For more information about rebuttal, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/3959097
Philosphical the last word because it means its devoted to the study of knowledge
28•7=4
Don’t understand what your trying to say
But the dot is suppose to be the division sign
Answer:
The quote didn't apply to minorities. This was because they weren't seen as people.
Explanation:
Back then, minorities were seen as lesser, unintelligent beings. This is why slaver wasnt technically unconstitutional.
