Let p be: John goes to the beach
Let q be: He will go surfing.
Then in symbolic form, the argument becomes:
p ⇒ q
p
---------------------
∴ q
An argument is valid if the conjuction of the premises implies the conclusion.
p | q | p ⇒ q | (p ⇒ q) ∧ p | [(p ⇒ q) ∧ p] ⇒ q
---------------------------------------------------------------------\
F | F | T | F | T
F | T | T | F | T
T | F | F | F | T
T | T | T | T | T
The table above shows that the argument is a tautology.
Hence, the argument is valid
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Required
Solve
Substitute 9 for x in
Remove bracket
Simplify fraction
I'm sorry but there's not enough info
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
its the third one because it has a lot of electrons on it already
Answer:
<h3>The answer is option C</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
x² + 5x - 24
To factorize first write 5x as a difference so that when subtracted will give you 5 and when multiplied will give you - 24
That's
x² + 8x - 3x - 24
Factorize x out
That's
x( x + 8) - 3(x + 8)
Factor x + 8 out
We have the final answer as
<h3>(x + 8)(x - 3)</h3>
Hope this helps you
