Describe some of the general differences between President Roosevelt's New Deal program and President Obama's Bail-Out plan

1 answer:

5 0

While the New Deal Program from Roosevelt president was a series of different programs that included public work projects, and financial reforms and regulation. The Bail-Out plan of president Obama was a law created to subprime the mortgage crisis.

New Deal Program

- Its main purpose was to finish with the unemployment of 13 million people.

- Fight against the negative effects of the great depression.

Bail-Out plan.

- This was a created to give authorization to the United States Secretary Of Treasury to spend about $700 billion for buying all those distressed assets and supply direct cash to the banks.

So as you can see the New Deal program was more of a social one, it was aimed to reduce unemployment and create a better economical atmosphere for the country with laws for the agriculture. The Bail out plan was proposed to bring liquidity to the banks.

You might be interested in

In very embarrassing or stressful scenarios, Luke is able to maintain his composure and help others to feel comfortable. Luke's

ankoles [38]

Answer:

emotional intelligence

Explanation:

Emotional intelligence refers to recognition and managing emotion while interaction. It is not just the ability to understand one's own emotion but it also includes how your behavior affects the emotions of others. It determines how one manages their relationships every day. It has a significant role in our daily life as it helps to deal with problems of daily life.

As per the question, Luke's ability to identify and manage his emotions in a stressful situation reflects his good emotional intelligence.

7 0

4 years ago

What word describes the beginnings of islam

Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

I think it would be Muhammad Ali because he is the founder of Islam if thats what you mean.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, she must prove the defendant acte

Shkiper50 [21]

A. True. In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), she must prove the defendant acted in an extreme and outrageous manner, that the defendant acted intentionally or recklessly, that the defendants acts are the cause of the distress and that the plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant's conduct.

4 0

4 years ago

Jose always finishes his work on time and he is a very popular choice in class for group work because he is known for his worth

Nimfa-mama [501]

Answer:

Leadership and Time Management

3 0

2 years ago

Jewish law prescribes that their deceased be buried in a shroud (a tachrichim) in simple pine box with no metal parts. Muslims,

Over [174]

Answer:

i take B as my answer to this question.

8 0

3 years ago