Patterns of direct verbal assertiveness, linear logic, straightforwardness, and transparent messages are often generated from collectivistic cultures, in which shared assumptions are not taken for granted and where people value when others say what they mean and mean what they say.
<h3>What are collectivistic cultures?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the type of cultures that would have the needs and the goals of the entire group in such a way that it is what is emphasized instead of picking the needs of the singular individuals in the group.
From the term collectivistic, we can get that it is trying to talk about the entire group of persons that are in a particular culture and not that of one person.
The culture of a people can be defined as the way of life of the entire group of people in the way that they do things.
Read more on collectivistic cultures here: brainly.com/question/1476127
#SPJ1
Answer:
A: the purchase of new computers
Explanation:
An accounting transaction happens when a situation has a monetary impact on the financial statements of a business.
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
