Peer review helps scientists do their job better by giving them feedback from others. It also helps control the quality of scientific research and publications.
Answer:
What this statement means is that experimentation is not enough, but that true knowledge comes from the analysis of results in a critical and meticulous way
Explanation:
Scientific knowledge is based on the scientific method and the results of the research, however that information is useless if it is not interpreted.
When the results are analyzed by scientists who support the same theories and have the same opinions, the results are not enriched as much as when exposed to different points of view. The debate tests the hypothesis giving rise to more complete answers.
When climbing a mountain, we can observe transitions in biological communities that are analogous to the changes in biomes at different latitudes.
Answer:
replication takes place from 5' to 3'
Explanation:
Every person has their own part to play or if you want to get scientific then a niche. And if somebody doesn't do their job then it could slow everyone else down. Maybe I don't fully understand the question, But I hope its right.
