1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bas_tet [7]
3 years ago
7

You are considering how to invest part of your retirement savings.You have decided to put $ 400 comma 000 into three​ stocks: 56

% of the money in GoldFinger​ (currently $ 16​/share), 18 % of the money in Moosehead​ (currently $ 77​/share), and the remainder in Venture Associates​ (currently $ 4​/share). Suppose GoldFinger stock goes up to $ 41​/share, Moosehead stock drops to $ 69​/share, and Venture Associates stock rises to $ 17 per share. a. What is the new value of the​ portfolio? b. What return did the portfolio​ earn? c. If you​ don't buy or sell any shares after the price​ change, what are your new portfolio​ weights?
Business
1 answer:
slamgirl [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Money invested in Gold finger = 56% of $400,000 = $224,000

No. of stocks of Gold finger purchased = $224,000 /$16 = 14,000 shares.

Money invested in Moose head = 18% of $400,000 = $72,000.

No. of stocks of Moose head = $72,000/$77 = 935 shares

Money invested in Venture Associates = 400,000-(224,000-72,000) = $104,000

No. of stocks of Venture Associates = $104,000/$4 = 26000 shares

New value of portfolio = (14,000 shares × $41) + (935 shares×$69) +(26000 shares×$17)

= $574,000 + $64,515 + $ 442,000

= $1,080,515

1. Thus portfolio value after all changes in stock prices are accounted for = $1,080,515

2. % change in portfolio = (1080515-400000)/400000 = 170%

3. Weight of each stock in the portfolio:

Weight of Gold finger = (574,000)/1080515 = 53.12%

Weight of Moose head = (64,515)/1080515 = 5.97%

Weight of Venture Associates = (442,000)/1080515 = 40.91%

You might be interested in
Based on a predicted level of production and sales of 21,000 units, a company anticipates total variable costs of $105,000, fixe
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

The budgeted amount of fixed costs for 19,000 units is  $155,800

Explanation:

According to the Given Scenario the Following are Computation to find out the budgeted amount of fixed costs for 19,000 units.

Current Contribution Margin = \frac{Fixed Cost + Operating Income}{No of Unit Sold}

Current Contribution Margin =$25,200 + $147,000/21,000

Current Contribution Margin = $172,200/21,000

Current Contribution Margin = $8.2 per Unit

The Contribution Margin for 19,000 units = $8.2 × 19,000

The Contribution Margin for 19,000 units = $155,800

Therefore, The budgeted amount of fixed costs for 19,000 units is  $155,800

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You are applying for jobs at two companies. company a offers starting salaries with $31,000 and $1000. company b offers starting
nekit [7.7K]
Company B will more than likely offer 33,000 because they are willing to go above 5000 dollars in negotiations. The other company is only willing to negotiate up to 1000.
5 0
4 years ago
Common resources versus private goods
kari74 [83]

Answer: <em>Please refer to Explanation</em>

Explanation:

1. The fish in the river are considered <u>rival in consumption</u> and <u>non-excludable</u> whereas the fish in the private stream are <u>rival in consumption</u> and <u>excludable</u>.

When a good is said to be Rival in Consumption, it means if it is consumed by one person first, another person cannot get it which reduces their chances of getting the same good. Once Eric consumes or catches a fish, no one else can catch that fish which means fishing is a Rival in consumption activity.

When a good is said to be Excludable, it means that people can be prevented from accessing the good of they have not paid for it. The pond on Eric's property is private so people cannot just come in and fish. It is Excludable. Non-Excludable on the other hand is the inverse and means people who have not paid can access the good like the river in town.

2. In other words, the fish in the river are example of <u>common resource </u>and the fish in the private stream are an example of <u>private good</u>.

Common resources are available to everyone as they are in the public domain like the fish in the river. Private goods however are not in the public domain and ate meant to be accessed by only certain people like the private stream which is only accessible by Eric's family or whoever they want to have access to it.

3. Fishing in the river will likely lead to the <u>tragedy of commons</u> because of which of the following reasons?,

B. anyone can fish in the river, and one person's fishing activity decreases the ability of someone else to fish with success.

The Tragedy of the Commons is an Economic explanation of the situation whereby people who have easy access to a resource such as the river in this instance, are able to use it with little cost to them. This might lead to a situation where they use it to the detriment of others because they will fish more and this will reduce the amount of fish left for others.

4 0
4 years ago
Paar Corporation bought 100 percent of Kimmel, Inc., on January 1, 2012. On that date, Paar's equipment (10-year life) has a boo
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

B)  574,000

Explanation:

Equipment book of Paar value on december 31/14 of $294,000.-  

Add Kimmels equipment book value on december 31/14 of $190,00

Add original acquisition-date allocation to Kimmel´s equipment of ($400,000 - $272,000) = $128,000

Less Amortization of alloction ($128,000 / 10 years for 3 years) = (38,400)

Eqcuals consolidated equipment of $574,000

8 0
3 years ago
The annual output and prices of a 3-good economy are shown in the table below. instructions: enter your answers as whole numbers
Alex777 [14]

In getting the GDP or Gross Domestic Product for year 1 and year 2, you should multiply the price to the quantity of goods sold and add them all up.

 

For GDP Year 1

 

Given:

 

Quarts of Ice Cream with a price of $6 and 4 quantity of goods.

 

Bottle of Shampoo with a price of $5 and 2 quantity of goods.

 

Jars of Peanut butter with a price of $3 and 4 quantity of goods.

 

= (6 x 4) + (5 x 2) + (3 x 4)

 

= $46

 

For GDP Year 2, the same products with different price and quantity.

 

= (6 x 6) + (5 x 3) + (3 x 3)

 

= $60

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements is true of product lines? Group of answer choices They require greater transportation and ware
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following most accurately describes an impact of the Navigation Acts? a. Wages of Southern plantation owners increa
    14·1 answer
  • Employers are not bound by the flsa regarding employees classified as ________ employees.
    15·1 answer
  • The Marchetti Soup Company entered into the following transactions during the month of June:
    15·1 answer
  • Why would a brand seek to establish points of parity?
    14·1 answer
  • A federally funded compensatory education program established in 1965 to improve the basic skills of low-ability students from l
    7·1 answer
  • What is the difference between earnings per share (EPS), funds from operations (FFO), adjusted funds from operations (AFFO), and
    9·1 answer
  • What are the penalties for lenders violating The truth lending act
    8·1 answer
  • Henry accepted a new position at a ball bearing manufacturing plant after graduation from college. With his macroeconomic educat
    9·1 answer
  • __________ marketing involves developing a unique mix of goods and services for each individual customer.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!