Answer:
if n=1 (monopoly) we have 
if n goes to infinity (approaching competitive level), we get the competition quantity that would be 
Explanation:
In the case of a homogeneous-good Cournot model we have that firm i will solve the following profit maximizing problem
from the FPC we have that
since all firms are homogeneous this means that 
then 
the industry output is then
if n=1 (monopoly) we have
if n goes to infinity (approaching competitive level), we get the competition quantity that would be
Answer:
At 1.783 or more, the conversion yield better gain than sales the corn
Explanation:
The ethanol conversion become attractive if the cost for doing the conversion are lower than the sale revenue for the product.
<u>total cost: raw materials + conversion cost</u>
corn price: $ 3.75
conversion cost: $ 1.60
Total cost: $ 5.35
<u>output: gallon of ethanol per bushel</u>
3 gallons of ethanol per bushel
total cost / output = 5.35/3 = 1.783 cost per gallon
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
The poverty rate is the proportion of those whose income falls below the poverty line, as well as, the official poverty level of 2016 was 12.7% when half of the median family income for the overall population. Below are the highest poverty level features in 2016:
- Desire to share exposure to food and clean water.
- Entry to living standards or jobs is little to no.
- Conflict.
- The unfairness.
- Wretched schooling.
- The shift in the atmosphere.
- Transportation deficit.
- The government's limited capacity.
Marketing links producers to customers.
That is the answerzb
Answer:
c. He was a member of the French Parliament using satire to illustrate the foolishness of the arguments used by the proponents of trade restrictions.
Explanation:
Frédéric Bastiat was an economist, journalist and member of the French parliament in the wing of economic liberalism. Regarding his economic thinking, Bastiat had a strong inclination or liberalism and consumer protection against any kind of corporate authority. For him, the government was responsible for guaranteeing the lives of citizens, individual and commercial freedom and protection of property. Regarding commercial freedom, he presented himself against commercial restrictions, he thought this was a step backwards and satirized those who defended it, as you can see in the question above.
