Answer:
Explanation:
Political legitimacy is considered a basic condition for governing, without which a government will suffer legislative deadlock(s) and collapse. In political systems where this is not the case, unpopular régimes survive because they are considered legitimate by a small, influential élite.
Well... I believe that the answer to your question is A. because if the Emperor would have to ask the pope if they could go to war and the pope was the one who crowned the Emperors.
They are similar because the bill of rights was not obligatory when it was made, the states didn't have to abide by it yet because the supreme court didn't decide so. The Arizona Article II was similar to it to make sure the state abides by it. They are different for the simple reason that there are parts that are not based on the bill of rights, like the bill of rights has things not found in it, but the essence is the same.
answer:
new england was ideal for the development for factories because the ppor soil caused people to leave their farms, to find work, river provided water power to run machinery, easily accessible ports for passage, proximity to resources.
explanation:
They divided into so many city-states because of geography. The <span>mountainous terrain, many isolated valleys, and numerous offshore islands encouraged the formation of many local centers of power, rather than one all-powerful capital.</span>
