1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Akimi4 [234]
3 years ago
15

The reinvestment of capital gains and dividends can make a significant difference in your total return. Consider the following s

ituation to determine the difference reinvestment can make over a​ five-year period. Initial purchase amount ​$12 comma 000 Initial purchase date January 1 Initial purchase price ​$18.86 per share Annual capital gains distribution rate 1.17​% Annual dividend distribution rate 0.95​% Annual price appreciation rate 7.84​% ​(before distribution) Assume all distributions are made on the last day of the year at the closing net asset value​ (NAV). Ignore tax consequences for the scenarios in a and​ b, below. a. Calculate the ending investment value plus the total of distributions received assuming no reinvestment. b. Calculate the ending investment value assuming all distributions are reinvested. c. Calculate and explain the difference.
Business
1 answer:
weeeeeb [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

a.) Ending Investment Value = (1 + 0.0784 ‬)∧5 x 12,000 = 1.0784∧5 x 12000 =$1.4585 x 12,000 =$17,502

    Cumulative Annual Dividends Received = 0.0095 x 12,000 x 5 =114 x 5

= $570

    Cumulative Annual Distributions Received = 0.0117 x 12,000 x 5 =$140.4 x 5 = $702    

    Total Value of Portfolio at 5-year end =$17,502 + $570  + $702 =$18,774

b.) Value of Share in the beginning =$18.86

Assuming dividends are invested as soon as they are received,

Amount at the end of first year = 12,000 x 1.0784 + (0.0095+0.0117) x 12,000 = 12,940.8 + 254.4 = 13,195.2

Amount at the end of second year = 13,195.2  x 1.0784 + (0.0095+0.0117) x 13,195.2  = 14,229.7 + 279.74 = 14,509.44

Amount at the end of third year = 14,509.44 x 1.0784 + (0.0095+0.0117) x 14,509.44 = 15,646.98 + 307.6 = 15,954.58

Amount at the end of fourth year =15,954.58 x 1.0784 + (0.0095+0.0117) x 15,954.58 =17,205.42 + 338.24 = 17,543.66

Amount at the end of fifth year = 17,543.66 x 1.0784 + (0.0095+0.0117) x 17,543.66 = 18,919.08 + 371.93 = 19,291.01

c.) The sum in the part-(b) is higher and shows the distinction reinvestment can prompt. With the reinvestment, the profits and other capital increase circulation will gain premium moreover and the exacerbating impact happens on the general contributed sum. This will prompt higher incentive towards the last time frame.

You might be interested in
Parent corporation owns all of subsidiary corporations stock in addition parent corporation owns $100,000 of subsidiary corporat
Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

In this case, when the subsidiary corporation is completely liquidated they have to pay the $100,000 in the subsidiary corporation's bonds.

Explanation:

The reason behind this answer is that in case the subsidiary corporations decide to liquidate all of their assets in any case. They still have a debt to the parent corporation of $100,000. So, after they liquidate they have to take some of the money to pay the debt issued of those bonds. No matter what, or the parent company can write a lawsuit against them for not doing so.

3 0
4 years ago
An exclusive right to display a word, slogan, symbol, or emblem that distinctively identifies a company, product, or service is
MAXImum [283]
It is referred to as a Trademark
4 0
3 years ago
The 1-year, 2-year. 3-year,and 4-year risk-free zero rates are 4%, 4.5%, 4.75%, and 5% with continuous compounding. What is the
dybincka [34]

Answer:

5.25%

Explanation:

Mathematically, investing at the 3-year risk-free zero rate should be the same as investing at a 2-year risk-free zero rate and one-year forward rate beginning in two years as shown thus

(1+S3)^3=(1+S2)^2*(1+y2y1)^1

S3=4.75%

S2=4.5%

y2y1=unknown

(1+4.75%)^3=(1+4.5%)^2*(1+y2y1)

1+y2y1=(1+4.75%)^3/(1+4.5%)^2

y2y1=((1+4.75%)^3/(1+4.5%)^2)-1

y2y1=5.25%

6 0
3 years ago
Eisentrout Corporation has two production departments, Machining and Customizing. The company uses a job-order costing system an
SOVA2 [1]
I think it is a I think
3 0
3 years ago
Compared to those people who prefer to play it safe, individuals who are more comfortable taking risks are more likely to reach
steposvetlana [31]

The answer is true. In economics, the supposition of ceteris paribus, a Latin expression that means "with other things the same" is significant in defining causation. It helps separate numerous independent variables touching a dependent variable. Causal relationships among financial variables are hard to separate in the real world, ever since most economic variables are typically affected by more than one cause, but reproductions often hinge on a supposition of independent variables.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • At her death Siena owned real estate worth $200,000 that was titled with her sister in joint tenancy with the right of survivors
    10·1 answer
  • Dog owners do not bear the full cost of the noise their barking dogs create and often take too few precautions to prevent their
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an advantage that teen entrepreneurs may be more likely than adults to have? A. Legal ownership of the
    10·2 answers
  • Analysis of data management tools for diabetes self-management; can smart phone technology keep up?
    5·1 answer
  • Kite Flite is considering making and selling custom kites in two sizes. The small kites would be priced at $12 and the large kit
    6·1 answer
  • Identify whether each of the following would be reported as an operating, investing, or financing activity on the statement of c
    14·1 answer
  • Packaging materials for processed​
    10·1 answer
  • Classical economists believed that: a discretionary fiscal policies were useful for dampening business cycle fluctuations. b mon
    6·1 answer
  • How do banks make profits?
    11·2 answers
  • Suppose that the government decides to regulate this natural monopolist by requiring the firm to charge a price of P2. Which is
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!