1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ki77a [65]
3 years ago
5

How would the early Republican Party have felt about the Dred Scott decision?

History
2 answers:
Natali5045456 [20]3 years ago
7 0
<span>It would have opposed it because it weakened free labor.</span>
nadya68 [22]3 years ago
5 0

Republicans protested the Dred Scott decision because it nullified their anti-slavery program. It had also reinforced the suspicion that the pro-slavery faction was plotting a conspiracy. Congress had an obligation to protect the property of slaveholders, making a federal slave code the next step in the militant effort to defend slavery.

You might be interested in
Do you think the Assyrians’ almost exclusive reliance on military power was a good strategy for creating their empire? Why or wh
zloy xaker [14]
<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that no, this was not a good strategy, since it left no room to form treaties. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Was the massachusetts bay colony a theocracy
Vika [28.1K]
IN THE 1630S, ENGLISH PURITANS IN MASSACHUSETTS BAY COLONY CRE- ATED A SELF-GOVERNMENT THAT WENT FAR BEYOND WHAT EXISTED IN ENGLAND. SOME HISTORIANS ARGUE THAT IT WAS A RELIGIOUS GOVERNMENT, OR THEOCRACY. ... Many Anglicans were called Puritans because they wanted to purify the church and make it simpler.
8 0
3 years ago
A criminal court is most likely to punish a person convicted of a
ziro4ka [17]

Answer:

c

Explacnation:

6 0
3 years ago
Anybody know 1.b ?explain what major river did the rule of mansa musa have on mali and west africa?
Usimov [2.4K]
1b) The Níger river is important because it helped the grow their crops and control trade on the river.
8 0
3 years ago
Was the US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family? Why?
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

The US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family is described below in complete detail.

Explanation:

The Dred Scott judgment was the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment on March 6, 1857, that has existed in a free state and region did not authorize a slave character, Dred Scott, to his independence.

They dictated that African Americans, whether they were slaves or had parents who were slaves, had no constitutional avenue in court. They believed that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. In the cores of the court, Dred Scott had no constitutional right to demand his freedom.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need ideas of what events are happening that compares to at least one event in earlier history. Like what in the world is taki
    9·1 answer
  • Thirty years after the flying shuttle, which textile innovation doubled textile production again by increasing the number of thr
    8·1 answer
  • Which literary device involves the repetition of vowel sounds across successive or closely placed words ?
    14·2 answers
  • What major reason did the senate fail to ratify the treaty of versailles
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the military and cultural factors that led to the Mongol conquests of China and the Muslim kingdoms. Include what you r
    8·1 answer
  • In what way is present-day Ethiopia different from neighboring lands?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Father Hidalgo ask for help from the French governor in Louisiana?
    12·1 answer
  • The overall goal of New Deal legislation such as the CCC, WPA, and TVA was to create:
    8·1 answer
  • Match the vocabulary word with its meaning.
    11·1 answer
  • How did collective security in the 1960s contribute to the United States foreign-policy
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!