Assuming that you are referring to the territories of today's Mexico, formerly know as <em>New Spain</em>, here is the paragraph:
As Hernan Cortes campaigned throughout the first continental lands of America, the idea that many Spaniards, probably even himself, harbored was that of founding Spain all over again in the newly found and conquered lands. A mix of nostalgia and pride for the Motherland, Spain, must have prompted the <em>Conquistadors</em> to name the cities and provinces they founded after cities and provinces already existing in Spain. One reason for using already familiar names had to do with the difficulty of pronouncing the original names of the places given by the native people, the other one had to do with a sense of control, since most people hold the belief that naming things bestows them with a degree of control over them. And yet another reason may have been the comfort of living in places named after their old home towns and provinces the Spaniards had come from.
Roger Williams was banished from the Massachusetts Bay Colony and then settled in Rhode Island and started the Baptist Church.
There are scientific sources that affirm that communism is the extreme form of socialism, others affirm that after the Second World War, socialism appeared as a transformed form of communism.
Now, in terms of the economic focus of both we have;
COMMUNISM:
<em>The goods of production are handled by all, that is to say that the concept of property within the goods of production is annulled.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>The production is related only to meet human needs, without the need for money.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Look for the condition in which material abundance exists.
</em>
SOCIALISM:
<em>The means of production are from public companies or cooperatives.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Individuals are compensated according to the principle of individual contribution.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Production can be coordinated by economic planning or economic markets.</em>
