Answer:
When the article discusses that Nia Dennis wishes to incorporate the struggles and victories of the African-American population into her routines, he shows evidence that supports her and wants the routines to reflect who she is.
Explanation:
Nia Dennis said that the "black life matters" movement is her biggest inspiration when it comes to sport and art and that she wants to incorporate that into her presentations and routines, showing how proud she is of the African American population, which she does he leaves, and he wants everyone to know about it and that is why he always incorporates facts about the struggle and the victories of the black people in her routines.
Answer:
They give you a sense of loyalty and friendship. He is describing that his First Friend is obedient.
Answer:
There aren't. You have found all the adverbs in the passage:
1. slowly
2. quietly
3. beautifully
4. loudly
Explanation:
An adverb is a word that modifies a verb, an adjective or another adverb. It is common for adverbs to have -ly at their endings, but that will not necessarily be the case with all of them. Some examples of adverbs are: well, quickly, early, sweetly, etc.
Let's focus now on the adverbs found in the passage and the words they are modifying:
1. slowly --> modifies the verb "walked"
2. quietly --> modifies the verb "moved"
3. beautifully --> modifies the verb "playing"
4. loudly --> modifies the verb "playing" in a different sentence
Answer: джинсов, как шпагу из ножен, — но не успел он встать во весь рост, как его макушка ... Тебе запрещено, — мигом сказал Дадли. — Думаешь, я не знаю? ... том и мечтал, чтобы по окончании Хогвартса сражаться с Тёмными ... он поступает, когда встречается с папой на работе, — наверно, делает вид
Explanation:
This is a very complex question. Who’s fault it? Essentially, it would be the companies since they are making them for profit. But, don’t they just make them? Or would it be the doctors who prescribe them knowing that it can be addiictive? But, aren’t they prescribing them to help? Both and none of them should be held accountable.
Why both of them should be held accountable: Yes, these companies are the ones who make them in the first place. But, although this is true, they make them for medical professionals. They do make money but not all of them have the goal to make people addiictted to them. They are the ones who make them.
Doctors are the ones who prescribe the medication. Although some of them goes against the doctor oath and sell them to groups and by other means. But most doctors prescribe them to help people. Sometimes doctors prescribe to high doses of these medications, but that’s only some doctors. Some doctors only prescribe them in extreme cases. Blaming all doctors would be very, very wrong.
Why it’s neither their faults: Some people who gets prescribed these medications might sell, distribute, or use them beyond the recommendation. Blaming doctors or the medication companies would be underestimating that individuals are to blame too. Plus, in some cases, people might even fake conditions like anxiety, depression and pain to get prescribed the medication.
End note: In reality, it’s both and neither their faults. Why? Because not all companies and doctors do any wrong. There are people who really need these medications to even be able to function through the day, and there’s some who misuse it. The fact is that these medications are needed, but some people misuse them them.
